Goodeye8

The American politics are vibe politics. You can have no policies but as long as you say the thing people want to hear people will vote for you. I can absolutely see why some people thought a wealthy criminal who regularly screws people over would side with the working class. Because Trumps campaign did focus on working class issues. It doesn’t matter that his “solution” to those problems was blame the immigrants and he had no real intention of helping the working class. Because for the average American the politics end at “I hear you”. That’s what the average American cares about, having their problems being acknowledged. Actually solving the problems is a problem for a different time.

That messaging in the right-wing propaganda sphere is just the continuation of the campaign, because somehow it works even when those people see the contradictions on a daily basis.

I don’t think it had a big marketing strategy, but it definitely marketed itself through word of mouth because it definitely deserved all the praise (and now awards) it got.

And never did I argue the opposite. The question was: supposing Ukrainians wish to concede territory, would you still support them?

If you never argued the opposite what’s the point of you question? Or do you just like to ask about unfounded hypotheticals?

Potentially, but given your own source, a solid portion of Ukrainians dont share those warm and fuzzies.

Am I supposed to believe you purely coincidentally happened upon the lowest trust poll? How about we look at the latest data of the same poll. Turns out a big majority of Ukrainians do trust Zelenskyy.

I don’t think anyone is questioning whether Ukrainians want the war to end. Of course the majority want the war to end as soon as possible. However, when asked specifically about territorial concessions the majority of Ukrainians are not willing to accept concessions. Source.

Maybe the Ukrainian leadership knows more about what the average Ukrainian wants than you do?

Not to dunk on the other guy but from my experience even if the country has laws against this nothing will be done unless the wronged person pushes to get something done. The laws don’t matter if citizens don’t make sure they’re enforced.

People, know your labor rights and use them. No, don’t try to take the high road. A lot of companies expect you to take the high road and trample over you. I know it’s stressful but I can guarantee you’ll feel so much better when the big guy gets fucked by the law.

They’re trying to squeeze the last water out of the rock while hoping to dip out before everyone realizes everything has been squeezed out.

There’s this reminded of a bit by Ari Matti where he goes “you people put sugar on your medicine. You know the rest of the world doesn’t do that?”

Maybe vaccines laced with sugar is the answer America needs.

I’m genuinely amazed at how naturally evil they look. You don’t even need to know who they are, you can tell just by looking at them that they’re arll pieces of shit.

It’s a chance for families to enjoy each others’ company

So you’re saying she did nothing wrong?

The documents will get released. Both sides simply need to come to an agreement on who are going to be the sacrificial lambs they’re going to throw on the pitchforks. I guarantee all the top names from both sides will be redacted while expendable names will be left in.

It has its benefits. You can talk absolute depravity, like Trump farting so much shit into Ivankas mouth that liquid diarrhea is overflowing from the side of her mouth with chunks of yesterday’s pasta bolognese dangling off her chin, and get no mental image of that filth. But you can enjoy that imagery.

I don’t think Tencent cares that much about Chinese nationalism to push for a China themed AC. It seems to me like Tencent just likes to stick their hand in every pot and make money. At least that’s what I think, I don’t know what they’re doing behind the scenes.

Yeah. It technically very impressive and and can have very impressive results if used properly. But all of the excellent uses and technical marvels get vastly overshadowed non-technical management going “what if you could have a chat with your toaster as it toasts your bread? Genius.” The people at the top have no fucking idea what they have and thus they have no idea how to use it which is why they throw everything at it to see what sticks.

I low key believe MAGA is more concerned with Trump allegedly sucking cock than him allegedly fucking kids. MAGA can excuse fucking children but they draw the line at being a cocksucker.

I have to agree that killing online only games makes sense because they can’t be forced to run the server forever, not they can be forced to release the source code. But offline / solo / bots should keep working.

We are not in agreement. It doesn’t make sense even for online games.

The politicians statement is not what SKG is about. SKG is not trying to preserve every version of a game. It would be cool if that was also on the table, but that’s not the purpose of the initiative. SKG is concerned with keeping the game playable AFTER the publisher/developer has decided it’s not longer worth maintaining. At that point the online video game is no longer a dynamic service because it’s no longer updated nor maintained. And that means it absolutely could be viewed as a static product. The point she is making is completely irrelevant to the initiative and shouldn’t even be a point of discussion.

This has already been addressed by SKG. Nobody is demanding the source code. Developers have multiple ways to solve this and SKG deliberately leaves that part open so developers could choose whatever works best for them.

Whoever told you developers would have to release the source code is lying and is against the initiative.

I’ll rephrase it more clearly then. Selfhosting focuses on the hosting aspect of software. [email protected] focuses on the development aspect of software. This article talks about the architectural decision made during development. It doesn’t talk about how to host serverless. It doesn’t even talk about why you wouldn’t want to selfhost serverless. It talks about bad software patterns the come with serverless. It also talks about the cost of running those things but even that is geared more towards enterprise level devops people.

It might be an interesting read from the software developer perspective but it’s not interesting from the selfhoster perspective, because the article has nothing to do with selfhosting.

The discussion is off topic for the same reason web development software patterns or the benefits of choosing one language over another aren’t really relevant to the selfhosting community. Because most self-hosters don’t develop the software they host, they set up existing software. Serverless technology itself might be relevant, if there was a project using that, but how the architectural decision impacts software development is not really relevant to self-hosters.

Exactly. Just like the dotcom bubble websites and web services aren’t the scam, the promise of it being some magical solution to everything is the scam.

If I wanted a ballsack on my face I’d go to grindr.