• etherphon@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    Because most people understand not everything should be allowed everywhere.

    That’s precisely my argument. I don’t think people need to be carrying them at all

    • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      ‘This shouldn’t be allowed everywhere’ and ‘This should be allowed nowhere’ are not the same arguement though, I don’t see how my quote fits your argument at all tbh.

      • etherphon@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Why are guns only allowed places where they are not, yet they champion their rights every where else. They can’t have it both ways. Either we are responsible people with the rights to carry guns places, or we shouldn’t have them. I don’t know why there is this grey zone, that is conveniently where they happen to be at all times, yet we are the ones constantly put in danger due to the lax gun laws and regulations

        • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          Either we are responsible people with the rights to carry guns places, or we shouldn’t have them.

          So your saying we should be able to carry guns either nowhere or everywhere?

          Do you also believe we should be allowed to shout ‘fire!’ either everywhere or nowhere or do you think its okay that you can’t do that in crowded places when there’s no fire?