• YeahIgotskills2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I don’t know why they didn’t just take a timeless classic Ferrari shell, stick a powerful as fuck EV ‘engine’ in it, maybe tweak the exterior very slightly, and go to town on the interior. Win.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t think it looks all that bad. Also of all the backlash people, how many were ever going to buy one?

    Complete non story this one. It’s been pushed by the anti-EV crowd

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Bro come on. Like the other person said, it doesn’t look like a Ferrari. It looks like an econobox. I don’t get why it’s so hard for them to make it look like a super/hypercar. Nobody wants to spend half a mil (or whatever) on this soccer mom-looking-ass-car.

    • wewbull@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      24 hours ago

      It would be a good looking Renault Megane. It’s a terrible looking Ferrari. It has nothing Ferrari about it.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Yeah, I can see that. Sort of my issue with the EV Mustang. It isn’t just an EV version of the Mustang. It’s a completely different car. Just call it something else. Maybe a different horse breed.

    • monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      24 hours ago

      The issue is that ferrari is only as valuable as it is perceived. If the brand is not thought of as being the best, then the product will not sell well (at the price).

  • youmaynotknow@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    The replacement comes from BMW, what could go wrong? $640,000 for the car, and $1,250 monthly subscription if you want the wheels to turn.

    • artyom@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      I don’t agree, but a lot of times the design is driven by efficiency, as it is far more important for an EV vs. ICE

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      I just don’t like that so many of them are fucking hatchbacks. I just want a sedan (that isn’t a god damned Tesla).

    • GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      There’s two big reasons.

      No front grill

      So much of a brand’s identity can be carried by the grill and headlights. And on an EV, there’s no need for a grill. But just a slab of flat metal looks weird, so they add stuff to break it up.

      Drag

      The range of an EV is a lot more sensitive to drag than an ICE car.

      So in order to reduce the drag, shapes are smoothed out.

      Aero efficiency becomes a much bigger priority than looks.

      • wewbull@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        24 hours ago

        I think you’re right, but optimising for drag is going to change all cars into the same thing. If brands want to retain any kind of identifiable look, they need the engineering to give them some slack.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        The front grill isn’t a problem for Ferrari design language. The 296 “grill” is mostly the haunches. An electric 296 would just flatten that out.

        Similar story on drag, once you get rid of the mid engine air intake, drag would probably be within respectable drag for EV.

        Questions would be about if they want a lot of battery range. This would screw up weight and ride height.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      The secretly don’t want to manufacture them so they make them look like shit?

      Obviously they can be made to look normal, the Ford Lightning & Mach E, Lucid, Polestar, and even a Tesla all look pretty normal and arguably some look really nice. But ask a mainstream manufacturer to make an EV car and they look stupid half the time. The Prius finally doesn’t look like it’s trying to virtue signal with its ugliness, so designs can be improved too.

      • T156@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        But ask a mainstream manufacturer to make an EV car and they look stupid half the time.

        IMO, it’s probably more that they overdesign them. They want the EV to look futuristic and unique compared to their regular cars, but their cars already look like that to some degree, and so they overcook the design into looking like some science fiction vehicle. Take the Ferrari, for example, they tried to make it have a floating arch where the hood would normally be.

        That’s fine for a movie or video game, but in real life, coupled with the practical limits, it just doesn’t look very good.

        • rafoix@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          The Ferrari was designed by Jony Ive. It definitely looks like something he would design. He’s all about clean, minimalist design where everything is utilitarian.

          Ferrari as a brand is about beautiful extravagant design in the fastest and least useful vehicles on the planet.

          I can’t think of a less synergistic combination that Ferrari and Jony Ive.

          Better fits for Jony Ive would be Hyundai, Kia, BMW and Mercedes. Those four are making some ugly ass cars that need to go back to the drawing board.

          • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            So, you are Ferrari and you hire the designer of the fucking original translucent iMac.

            The Luce is the iFerrari.

        • 0tan0d@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I think the Cadillac is doing a good job with their new EV design. They do a good job of making it look like a Cadillac but better.

      • labsin@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I don’t agree on the Prius. The 2026 version has worse consumption and a smaller trunk so it could look more like any other SUV. People buy these cause they are the best economics for the size and Toyota made it more like “what they think a phev suv should look like”. I’d say that’s the opposite of your point.

        • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          2024 and 2026 Prius both show 57/56 city/highway economy on fueleconomy.gov for the most economic models. The 2022 shows 54/50, the 2019 58/53.

          So it looks like average economy has improved.

          As for cargo, that’s unfortunate to lose space, but if they can get more people to buy the car because it looks more “normal” then that’s better, no?

      • Squizzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Tesla look like poo. Polestar are nicer by a mile but the backwindow is veey EV aesthetic

    • naeap@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I actually really like the look of my Renault Megane E-Tech
      Battery could be better, but else I’m really happy with it - and the look of it

    • Toga77@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Also completely subjective…

      The Ferrari Ev looks sick as do Hyundai’s offerings and hell even the new Prius is pretty cool. (I know it’s a hybrid)

      Maybe you just have a really narrow scope of appreciation lol.

      • wewbull@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        24 hours ago

        The fact that you’re mentioning it in the same sentence as a Hyundai is the problem with the Ferrari design. It just looks like a much cheaper car.

      • Ydna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I agree, debates about the ugliness or attractiveness of inanimate objects are very confusing.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Audi has the best looking cars to my eyye, of all the standard person cars. Their EVs are asstastic looking.

    • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      People who drive gas cars personally, make ugly EVs. They don’t build cars for themselves, they build cars for what their prejudiced minds think EV drivers want. The problem here is probably that none of the Ferrari leadership drives an EV.

    • rafoix@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      It looks fine.

      It just looks like a minimalist hatchback in a era where minimalist design is already overused.

      The interior is the only part of this vehicle that is actually interesting.

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      2 days ago

      I imagine that’s the issue, that it does in fact not look like a Ferrari, when it is supposed to be a Ferrari.

          • finalarbiter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            Tbh I don’t know high-end cars well enough to tell the difference. I thought some of the older Ferrari designs had that angular front, though?

            • LincolnsDogFido@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              2 days ago

              That was in the 80s when everything was angular. Lamborghini kept that going while Ferrari trended toward pointed front bumpers, rolling curves, and a bigger back end. The quintessential Ferrari is the 2002 Enzo Ferrari and this borrows non of the design elements from that.

              Don’t get me wrong, I actually don’t mind the design of the Ferrari Red Luce. The other colors look horrendous for some reason, but the red works for me. If I were nitpicking though, I think they could have slimmed down the chassis, gave the front end a bit more aggressive point, and reworked the back end to not look so flat. The designer is a former Apple guy and I think it shows. Purists would have wanted something bold to showcase a new era for Ferrari I think.

              • finalarbiter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Ah, gotcha. I didn’t realize they had an external designer for this, but I can totally see Ives’ touch now that you’ve pointed that out. It seems like a really odd choice to use an external designer with a very different design ethos on a product that is to launch that new era. I could see it as a one-off collaboration where they go “Look, we let Jonny Ives design a Ferrari!”, but this is the foundation of a new category of vehicles for Ferrari.

                The fact that this new vehicle doesn’t lean on the brand’s own history and design ethos tells me as a consumer that Ferrari either doesn’t have faith in its own design team anymore or is run by a bunch of out-of-touch executives who have no clue what their market wants. Either way, it’s pretty damning.

        • xthexder@l.sw0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Honestly, too many Cybertruck vibes for my taste. Maybe it’s better from other angles

          • finalarbiter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I feel like this what a more finished design of the cybertruck could have been. Personally, I like the sharp angles and strong lines on this car (to clarify, the cybertruck is fugly and has no redeeming qualities) and hope we see more of this style in the future.

            • xthexder@l.sw0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              I don’t mind the angular design, it’s the specific design element of having a straight line from the headlight to above the passengers with the huge windshield. It just seems like it has so many drawbacks for driver visibility and other packaging issues. There’s a reason you don’t normally see this outside of really low cars, or buses/trucks with a flat front.

    • billwashere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      I totally agree. It looks like a startup made a concept of a vehicle in a movie. It’s not ugly by any means ugly but when I see a Ferrari I KNOW it’s a Ferrari. Same way with a McLaren or a Lamborghini.

    • TIEPilot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Its growing on me. And the rims as an old GenX’er didn’t Vector have a set like that w/ the Bi-Turbo/Twin Turbo? I like the “Jet Turbine” look of them.

      .

      But I can see why an EV Ferrari would get backlash from the purists. Its not a traditional ICE race car. That said I see racing going to EV as the torque is insane on electric. We are already seeing it in drag bikes

      .

      Another prediction on EVs, their charging bottle neck will be filled by standardized batteries that can be removed by a robot.

      .

      Like a car wash you pull up, a clanker comes up from the floor and removes your batteries. They go into inventory to charge and can be cell by cell inspected and charged batteries are installed. 10 minutes TOPS.

      .

      This fixes recycling and repair. I’m sure I’m not the first to think of this, but its going to happen.

      .

      Oh and your correct this looks NOTHING like a Ferrari, I mean not even “Ferrari Red®”???

      We need better formatting of text on here asap,

      • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Like a car wash you pull up, a clanker comes up from the floor and removes your batteries. They go into inventory to charge and can be cell by cell inspected and charged batteries are installed. 10 minutes TOPS.

        This is already being done in China.

      • LincolnsDogFido@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Your battery take won’t come to fruition any time soon in the consumer market. Commercial trucking and such I can see, but consumers value interior space and standardizing a battery limits what you can do with the interior. Automakers would never pigeonhole themselves like that. Look at the cellphone and laptop market and their batteries.

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    The dual color scheme makes it look bad. Would look significantly better as one color.

  • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    120
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    There was no reason to make it look so out of place, unless they actually wanted to tank sales. Nothing about its look is necessitated by the EV drive train versus ICE.

    That’s not a marketing issue, that’s whoever approved that design. Which, to be fair, may be the marketing boss depending on how their corporate structure is.

    • starik@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 day ago

      Why don’t they ever do retro designs and bring back popular classic looks? An electric F40 would probably sell like crazy.

      • ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s definitely not possible to create something that looks exactly like that with modern safety design standards but they are being very stupid by not at least trying to evoke that more in their cars.

        Then again, as far as I understand it, rich people are completely detached from my idea of good taste. So we might like the classic designs and the companies might know their customers prefer novelty or “the next big thing” over that kind of continuity

        • Orygin@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Plus the EV platform package they used is basic AF and the battery under the seats means you have to elevate the cabin a lot

          • ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Low volume high end cars usually had a lot of overengineered solutions to problems that are now easily solved in modern budget cars by software and new materials/manufacturing. They could come up with a complicated battery system that gives them more design flexibility if they wanted to. They fucking should frankly.

            The one in the pictures had a fuel bladder system IIRC. Not as exotic as figuring out asymmetrical distribution of multiple different sized battery boxes, but they did weird stuff to make their cars all the time. That’s the point of exotic cars that look stupidly different from other cars.

            Cars are a weird one because they are a big part of the system of why the world sucks and luxury cars are just absurdly expensive status symbols. But fancy cars used to mean cool engineering! I’m even all for keeping most cars running on gasoline so long as there’s 90% fewer cars on the road. Usually online you can’t hate cars (the economic-social phenomenon ) and love cars (cool torque machine living room) at the same time. And I hate that

    • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Seriously marketing has so much power in my company. They dictate what products get developed. Meanwhile my so company they are treated like jesters.

  • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    The company’s shares plunged by 8% the day after the Luce was unveiled.

    Lol. They let an iPhone designer design a Ferrari, and it really shows.

    Whoever designed that smooth as a booger look clearly didn’t have a poster with Ferrari on it, in their room, as a kid.

    I would sell their stock too, if I had any.

  • arc99@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t think the car looks bad at all. The outside is a little bland tbf but it’s not ugly. I think the interior is incredibly tactile and well thought out. I think when we see people tearing around tracks that preorders are going to be extremely strong

    • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      The car doesn’t look bad? It looks like an 80’s SciFi prop.

      This is what a next Gen supercar should look like:

    • Ougie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Car actually doesn’t look that bad, true. I guess it’s just not what people expect when they hear Ferrari. Imho it’s one of those cars that won’t sell now but in 50 years it will be a sought after rarity.

  • ExFed@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    2 days ago

    The thing that gets me is when car designers make a car that’s trying to be something it’s not. It’s an EV, not an ICE vehicle. If anything, amplify the motor hum under load (accelerating). Don’t simulate engine sounds. We’re tired of living in a simulation.

  • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Ferrari has one of the greatest design teams in Pininfarina yet they choose a person famous for making a rounded rect to make a totally new product. This is what they get for their poor choices.