Image description:


Text: Amazon’s electric cargo bikes have arrived in DC.

Image: A four-wheeled vehicle that appears to be a cross between a bicycle, a go-cart, and a mini-truck

Response text from high t alpha shemale @gluetaster: that’s not a cargo bike man that’s a loopholemobile


Edit: I found a slightly higher-quality version of the image:

  • Deconceptualist@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    113
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good. These have to be far quieter and don’t pollute like cars. That’s progress!

    By all means, do criticise Amazon’s treatment of workers and horrible policies in general. And yeah batteries are better than fossil fuels but still aren’t the greenest. But IMO anything that brings the US closer to bicycle culture can’t be all bad. Let’s accept a win when we see it and keep pushing, yeah?

    The posts about Berlin and Finland are inspiring, let’s get others there too.

    • MBech@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      96
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Okay, but what is pictured is a car sized vehicle that is going to be moving in traffic in the same place as cars, while simultaniously having fuckall safety features and no climate control. This is a fucking deathtrap, and just a new way to cut costs at the expense of working class lives. This is not progress, the is sacrificing people for the great capitalist overlords.

      • mcv@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t know how fast it’s meant to go, but it looks like it shouldn’t be going faster than 30 kph (20 mph). That is the speed that most city traffic should have. If this helps to make that the standard, that’s going to save far more lives than anything else.

      • Donkter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Frankly, it is a loophole mobile unequivocally, but it’s a loophole that I would prefer that the laws change to accommodate rather than the other way around. “Deathtrap” is complete bs inspired by the same propaganda car companies use to justify bigger and bigger dangerous gas-guzzlers.

        If we want any validation for this we don’t have to look any further than every other developed city in the world. This is just a more fuel efficient, quieter, more agile, and safer-for-pedestrians way to navigate a crowded city.

        • tomkatt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I get what you’re saying, and I agree it’s technically a good thing. But I have a problem with the fact that as noted, there’s no climate control, and no safety features. This will be on the roads with normal vehicles, doesn’t fit in a bike lane, and despite essentially being an efficient car, there’s no seatbelt. If somebody gets t-boned in one of these, or in any kind of wreck in general with a standard car or truck, they will likely die horribly.

          I’ve no qualms with improving efficiency, but it shouldn’t come at the expense of safety for the vehicle operator who is being required to use this for work for likely many hours per day.

          • Donkter@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            I think we could find something to complain about for just about any solution. I’m glad you agree that it’s technically a good thing.

        • MML@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I would be fine if we all drove these (and of course the infrastructure was updated to accommodate)

          • Donkter@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            2 months ago

            That is exactly the propaganda.

            There’s the classic example that the car safety score is determined by whether the people inside the vehicle survive a crash. That leads to a perverse incentive in which car companies build a larger and more robust car to ensure their passengers survive crashes with no regard for the people they crash into. Since every car company is doing this they have to get bigger and bigger until we get the cars we have today that have to be registered as trucks.

            These vehicles might be less safe for the drivers in our world of super-trucks, but they are magnitudes safer for pedestrians. I would prefer every effort to normalize smaller vehicles and I think every vehicle like this that’s on the road means one less pedestrian-killer and an overall safer experience.

        • baines@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          i don’t see how these being in bike lanes could possible be a positive

          no one is using this to replace bigger vehicles, now you just have both

      • Deconceptualist@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Yep I would say you’re nailing the “criticize Amazon’s treatment of workers” part. That obviously is in severe need of fixing too.

        Would you prefer if that got addressed but they stayed purely on combustion engine vehicles? I appreciate the idealism and in a perfect world we’d have both, but actually expecting both outcomes at once is sadly a tall order…

        • SGforce@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          This isn’t a delivery bike. It’s for transferring cargo. That could have gone in a train or tram and been 100% electric while also not putting lives at risk.

          • Deconceptualist@leminal.space
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            You think the US has trains and trams that reach most neighborhoods? Not by a long shot.

            No this is definitely looks like a last mile delivery vehicle to me.

      • teft@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        that is going to be moving in traffic in the same place as cars,

        Doubt. Bikers already have to contend with electric bikes, electric mopeds, and electric motos in the bike lanes so you can guarantee these assholes will be there too, especially if the automobile roads are jammed.

    • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Are these things going to be clogging up bike lanes and making biking more dangerous for people that aren’t working for Amazon? Are they going to have their “drivers” risking their lives on the roads with real cars? Are they going to be out there peddling hundreds of pounds of packages for 8 hour shifts in 90 degree weather? Oh but it’s quieter and less polluting… cool cool cool. The human endangerment is worth it then.

      • Deconceptualist@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Are these things going to be clogging up bike lanes

        You must not be from the US. Bike lanes here are empty, mostly treated as extra shoulder for cars. I’m not concerned about this one bit.

        making biking more dangerous for people that aren’t working for Amazon

        No, I feel confident that fewer motorized vehicles does not mean more danger for cyclists.

        Are they going to have their “drivers” risking their lives on the roads with real cars? Are they going to be out there peddling hundreds of pounds of packages for 8 hour shifts in 90 degree weather?

        Except for the peddaling that sounds suspiciously similar to current conditions. That needs to be addressed too, but I don’t think vehicle type alone is sufficient.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          DC actually has a fair number of bikers around. It’s not as many as it should, but I’ve biked into and around DC, and it’s not bad. This will easily block an entire bike lane/trail/whatever though. This makes biking more difficult for everyone else, not less.

      • WatermelonPaloma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        People seem more than willing to throw workers under the bus, as long as they know those delivery drivers are using an electric vehicle that doesn’t take up space or make any noise. Never mind that it’s summer and high-temp records being broken daily, get these guys out in that 98 degree heat so I can get my package delivered right to my front doorstep.