This is the Lincoln Reflecting Pool in Washington DC, a treasured landmark seen in many iconic images and films. The mad king had it drained so that the bottom could be painted blue, adding an over-saturated “ocean” color.
Takes “gifts” for favors (political and personal). ❔
Pardons whomever he pleases. ❌
Has his friends and family ingrained in government. ❔
Holds a court of sycophants. ❔
Plans to stay in power indefinitely. ✔️
Meddles with election results. ❌
Tells the people his appointment is an act of God.❔
Will choose/appoint his successor upon his death. ❌
Denies words of the leader of the Catholic church, as if he stands above them. ❌
Renames landmarks and architecture after himself. ❌
Refuses to be (de-?)elected out of office. ✔️
Has his own armed forces outside of a standing army. ❌
Out of that list I’d say 2 apply (but they’re really the same thing), 4 are maybes, and 9 don’t apply to King Charles. He has very little real power. Influence, maybe, but the royals have a policy of never speaking on political topics.
You haven’t got a king in the US. You’ve got a dictator.
This is the Lincoln Reflecting Pool in Washington DC, a treasured landmark seen in many iconic images and films. The mad king had it drained so that the bottom could be painted blue, adding an over-saturated “ocean” color.
Why though?
So we are not talking how to dethrone a pedophile loser put in power by racist trash manipulated by oligarchs.
It does get refurbished every so often. That’s his excuse for making it tacky, the way he prefers things.
To distract from his child rape in the Epstein files and enrich his fellow oligarchs at the public’s expense.
Emphasis on ‘mad king’
Why indeed
Wait? What? I haven’t seen this in the news. It’s very stupid.
I thought it was a parking lot, and was very confused.
He’s not quite king yet.
He already is king in everything but title…
Even the British King only scores 10/15 on that list. Maybe Trump wants to be an Ayatollah instead of a King.
Out of that list I’d say 2 apply (but they’re really the same thing), 4 are maybes, and 9 don’t apply to King Charles. He has very little real power. Influence, maybe, but the royals have a policy of never speaking on political topics.
You haven’t got a king in the US. You’ve got a dictator.
As long as he stays in that office, he’s immune to prosecution or litigation of any kind. That’s kingly enough.
how so