Or just skip Google altogether:
https://noai.duckduckgo.com/

I think it was before 2010, I saw an article that said Wikipedia was already more accurate than traditional encyclopedias.

😆

I mean if I have to read the slop, I’ll still need to read Wikipedia to verify the accuracy. Just take me to the real info.

this is post ^is modern

That’s Children’s Pool Beach in La Jolla, California.

https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Children's_Pool_Beach

It’s become a sea lion colony, but you can also swim there. Just don’t get too close to the sea lions.

https://www.waterfox.com/

boot to the head

ah, throw them off guard before you
sweep the leg

pretty much implied

that sounds about right

that guy is writing
that’s what writing looks like
the mechanical process of putting the words down isn’t what people like about writing
it’s creating the words, and that is what that looks like (in the pics)

why does he want us afraid of AI

edit: to be clear, I find AI a waste, but it doesn’t scare me

edit2: I’m wondering if he’s saying it to help fabricate a justification for paying technology workers less—even though they’re still irreplaceable (contrary to what CEOs fantasize AI is capable of doing for them)

To make that appear inline instead of as a link, put ![]( before it and ) after it.

the storm, once named, keeps the name no matter its intensity

It should be impossible to waive your rights via TOS agreements for anyone.

I’m not sure we’ll have to wait even that long

“error” means “wrong”

and it’s wrong what they’re doing