It’s going to show gains exponentially, but like you said it’s not flashy, and media has an incentive to downplay it.
They’ll keep saying Dems are “over performing” but this is just the natural result of trying to win as many seats as possible.
We spent decades where neoliberal chairs wanted a Dem president, but enough Republicans in congress that meaningful progress wouldn’t be made.
It’s not “over performing”, just what happens when the party actually tries to get Dems elected instead of enforcing their policy on everyone with a D by their name.
None of this is surprising, it’s all right on track to FDR 2.0
We just can’t skip the shitty parts, or people won’t realize we need FDR 2.0 enough to vote for them when we get the chance.
We’re only a year deep too:
https://democrats.org/news/dnc-and-asdc-announces-organize-everywhere-win-anywhere-strategy-largest-ever-monthly-dnc-investment-into-democratic-state-and-territory-parties/
It’s going to show gains exponentially, but like you said it’s not flashy, and media has an incentive to downplay it.
They’ll keep saying Dems are “over performing” but this is just the natural result of trying to win as many seats as possible.
We spent decades where neoliberal chairs wanted a Dem president, but enough Republicans in congress that meaningful progress wouldn’t be made.
It’s not “over performing”, just what happens when the party actually tries to get Dems elected instead of enforcing their policy on everyone with a D by their name.
None of this is surprising, it’s all right on track to FDR 2.0
We just can’t skip the shitty parts, or people won’t realize we need FDR 2.0 enough to vote for them when we get the chance.