• Fuckfuckmyfuckingass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Capital punishment for C-suite level executives. People make these decisions and then hide behind the concept of corporations. Hold people accountable.

      • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        3 days ago

        I would settle for capital punishment for the corporation. Board dissolved. All assets sold at public auction with a pure lottery, so asshats can’t depend on buying any key asset. All stock voided.

        Could really get everyone on the same page about respecting the rule of law.

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    GDPR sets the example:

    20 million euros

    Or

    4% of your revenue

    Whichever is higher

    • DraconicSun@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      4 days ago

      4%? Nah, set it to 20% at the bare minimum. First one who gets hit with one fifth of their revenue getting yoinked away by the government would get everyone else in line.

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        4% of your revenue is a lot for a low-margin business, which is most of them. google’s margin is like 40% though.

        • Tetragrade@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          How about 20%, or issue the equivalent value in shares and hand them to to the state. Shareholders’ choice. Fuck up repeatedly and the state uses their control to replace senior management.

        • Iunnrais@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          3 days ago

          Then set the percentage based on the margin? Something that would genuinely hurt without simply dismantling the business, so there’s still something left to correct itself?

          • 9point6@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            Creative accounting would just make the margin zero for the purposes of the calculation. It’s a lot harder to magic away total revenue

            Also the purpose of the fine is not intended to be a slap on the wrist, it’s intended to be a strong deterrent to ensure companies do everything they can to ensure the law is followed. Most companies won’t take the risk of skipping compliance on something that could wipe the business out

            • Iunnrais@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Businesses are capable of providing useful things to the world. It’s a good thing to enable companies to improve the world while disabling their ability to harm it.

            • Sharkticon@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              It’s always fun when you run into a neoliberal in the wild. They can condone a lot of things like mass incarceration, crippling poverty, corrupt Justice systems, and of course genocide. Hurting a business though? That they can’t imagine.

              • StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                3 days ago

                Now this, THIS is absurd hyperbole. When you have to make massive assumptions about someone to make your point, you don’t have a point - you’re just making shit up.

    • atopi@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      wouldnt that mean smaller companies that hurt way less people would suffer more from the fine than bigger companies?

  • jama211@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s not a mosquito, it’s a small kickback they agreed to over cocktails. They’re in bed with those who choose the fines.

  • almost1337@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    3 days ago

    In addition to percentage based fines levied against the business, I feel that executives, board members, and major voting shareholders also need to face legal consequences.

  • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    4 days ago

    Fines need to be a percentage of gross income, so there’s no artificially suppressing the fine like they do their taxes.

    Lets see how long it takes to fix them if they’re paying 1% of their yearly intake daily as long as they’re out of compliance.

  • auzy1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ve never understood why the same hasn’t happened to Apple, who are just as bad (if not worse)

    • mPony@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I had an old Archie comic (WHERE EVERY WORD IS IN ALL CAPS!) where the word FLICK appeared. There was slight smearing of the print. Sure looked like the word FUCK to me at the time.

  • DraconicSun@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    Fines for corporations should be a percentage of their revenue. Google getting fined 25% of their total net worth would get them complying real fucking quick.

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Even with the small fines, constant fines could add up. Why else did Google and other tech companies support Trump? They are pissed during the Biden administration of the aggressive antitrust cases by the FTC under Lina Khan.