• doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 年前

    100 F is roughly a human’s body temp. (Actually 98.7 avg, but close anyway)

    0 F is goddam cold. (This one’s pretty arbitrary ngl)

    That probably isn’t very helpful.

    Fwiw, Celsius isn’t much better if you didn’t grow up with it. 0 C is pretty cold, 100 C can give you severe scalds. The actual range the people will encounter in weather in their day-to-day lives is all over the place regardless.

    Perhaps we are destined to stay divided

    • Khrux@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 年前

      I’m UK based and ~0°c to ~30°c (32-86f) covers 90% of the year for celcius. It’s still pretty unhelpful but I don’t think that feels any harder than using Farenheit in day to day use, I agree that it’s largely all arbitrary, but that’s as good of a reason to just use that one that’s scientifically useful too.

      • nelly_man@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 年前

        Maybe I’m biased because of where I live (the United States in the upper Midwest). The coldest winter night will usually be around -30 to -20°F, and the hottest summer day will usually be just over 100°F. But most days of the year fall between 0°F and 100°F, so Fahrenheit just seems to work well. 0 is a cold winter day, and 100 is a hot summer day.

    • Pok@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 年前

      Why does it have to be based on weather? There’s plenty of other reasons to measure temperature. Some with handy reference points that lots of people are familiar with.