• MareOfNights@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    1 day ago

    It was unlikely the proposed treatment would have sent Tennant into full remission, but the family believed it could have bought him some more time.

    Does an actual doctor believe that too?

    We don’t have infinite resources to spend on treatment that won’t actually help.

    This is a slop article. No actual info on success chances, prior treatments etc.

    • Doom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      23 hours ago

      OH SHUT THE FUCK UP WITH YOUR “FINITE” RESOURCES BULLSHIT. The DOCTOR recommended the treatment. The only barrier to having more time with their loved one wasn’t knowledge, or skill, or reSoUCEes… It was money, a FAKE thing WE invented. You know what IS a finite resource FUCKING TIME. Our priorities as a society are so absolutely bonkers. We could have given that family more of an actual unrenewable gift that can never be replaced, restored, or generated and instead we STOLE that from them to give more of an invented thing of fictious value to the elites. Elites that have so much of it already they could never conceivable spend it.

      • MareOfNights@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Counter-theory: nothing got stolen, the insurance already paid a million for other treatments buying him a lot of time, but in the end the cancer won.

        Now we don’t know any of that because the article is slop and doesn’t tell us anything that wouldn’t fit the sob-story narrative.

      • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        OH SHUT THE FUCK UP WITH YOUR “FINITE” RESOURCES BULLSHIT.

        No matter how much you scream, it will still be true. You can’t yell and curse it away.

        Money is finite, even if we made it up. Everyone can’t have everything.

        • GirthBrooksPLO@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Your argument rests upon the inaccurate assumption that because things are what they are, that it is inevitable that they will stay the same.

        • Doom@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Amazing how a supposedly finite resource can be printed on a whim at the convenience of specific class of people.

          • MareOfNights@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            So there is no reason, why all 300 million people in America shouldn’t get this treatment right now, in case they have cancer? All at once preferably.

    • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      The very beginning the article:

      It didn’t matter that Eric Tennant’s oncologist had recommended the medication to shrink his tumors.

      The patient’s health insurance allegedly stood in the way — until it was too late.

      • moakley@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        It still sounds like this was an experimental treatment. It was brought to the doctor by the patient’s wife. So we don’t know all the specifics of how likely it would have been to help.

        Even so, these kinds of experimental treatments are often paid for by the companies that provide them. There’s still a process they go through to get a “compassionate use” case approved, because they don’t have the resources to provide it to everyone who asks. I wonder if they were denied for this, if they never applied for it, or if this particular company just doesn’t offer it.

        I’m not saying that US healthcare isn’t fucked or anything. Just that the situation has more nuance than the headline suggests.

        Edit: sorry, should have realized when I saw the same headline on reddit that this was a reddit thread.

        The treatment definitely would have worked, and if we didn’t have health insurance companies then cancer would literally never kill anyone, because we’d just keep trying experimental treatments until everyone lived forever.

        • Apeman42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          19 hours ago

          I hope for your sake that boot polish isn’t a carcinogen when ingested orally.

          • moakley@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            17 hours ago

            You’re just trolling? Or your reading comprehension needs a lot of work? Or maybe you’re some kind of paranoid, living the loneliest life, because all you see are bootlickers everywhere. I genuinely don’t know which one it is.