• Hegar@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    The Greens senator David Shoebridge called the prime minister’s claim that no Australian personnel were involved in offensive action “extraordinary” and said it was inevitable that Australian personnel would be involved in US action.

    “This makes Australia obviously, clearly, unambiguously, part of an illegal war, part of a war that is breaking down the norms of international law and making the world a less safe place,” he said.

    “It is as sure as day follows night that Australians throughout the US military are actively involved, part of the United States and Israel’s illegal war in Iran.” … According to the Royal Australian Navy, one in 10 crew members onboard US Navy attack submarines is Australian.

    1 in 10 is a lot!

    • Zron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      I get he’s trying to make a point that Australia doesn’t want to be on the wrong side of history here, but I’m always confused by the term “illegal war”

      Like would killing civilians like the US did for nearly 30 years in the Middle East be better just because a bunch of old dudes were guided into a fancy room by aides and mumbled to each other before signing a piece of paper that says it’s legal?

      • Hegar@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Yeah i agree - states are institutions dedicated to violence. Whether or not they did some arcane legal rituals before murdering iranians and americans is hardly the point.

        But i do think it matters to show that the state is lying when it claims to use violence legitimately. It doesn’t even adher to its own made up rules.

        And it matters that their violence is so unpopular that they can’t even let a body as unrepresentative as the US congress get a say.