Pretty wild! All states give you at least 30 days to dump your baby, no strings attached. Some states give you 60 days!

I feel like more people should know about this! It seems like a highly under utilized ability.

  • abbiistabbii@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Reasonable. Now who’s gonna bet that some dip shit in Washington makes it illegal because “mothers should face the consequences of their decisions” or some bullshit.

    Call me a cynical old bitch but when the US does something reasonable I always think “how they gonna fuck it up this time?”

    • GarboDog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Fire stations are more anonymous, however you can give up rights to your child at Fire Stations, Police Stations, and Hospitals (far as we know) there are even some numbers and child protection will pick them up. Reason is because they rather take the child safely than deal with well… yk

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Fire stations are everywhere, staffed by trustworthy people, who inevitably also have medical training. Additionally they aren’t scary like the police are.
      They’re the people you call if you need help.

      You can surrender an infant at a hospital too, as well as a police station, but fire stations are just more frequent.

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Hospitals in the US are kind of scattered, largely as a result of private equity tomfoolery. A lot of communities don’t have one nearby. But pretty much every community has at least a volunteer fire station, and I believe all firefighters are required to be trained in at least first aid, if not be fully-qualified EMTs.

    • ronl2k@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      11 hours ago

      *US states

      Why was that clarification necessary? In what context does “all 50 states” not apply to only the US?

      • unphazed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Because there are other countries with states, like Mexico, Brazil, and India. Do you know how many states are in each country? Neither did I, until I looked some up. Mexico has 31 states, btw, and it’s causing my brain to itch with its odd number instead of even. There are no other countries with 50 states, but I didn’t know prior and now I have useless trivia folded into my melon.

        • ronl2k@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Because there are other countries with states… There are no other countries with 50 states,

          Exactly. So, what was the point of the USA clarification?

          • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Because there are other countries with states, like Mexico, Brazil, and India. Do you know how many states are in each country? Neither did I, until I looked some up. Mexico has 31 states, btw, and it’s causing my brain to itch with its odd number instead of even. There are no other countries with 50 states, but I didn’t know prior and now I have useless trivia folded into my melon.

          • AxExRx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 hours ago

            So if an article refered to ‘in the 36 states’ would you what country theyre talking about off the top of your head?

            answer

            Nigeria is the only country with exactly 36 states

            There are plenty of complains of the web being US-centric, that i think its perfectly fair to state, and not expect everyone from every country to know how many states, just because its America.

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    19 hours ago

    A while back I fell into the rabbit hole of people dropping off the baby without informing the other parent. turns out it’s really hard to get the kid back

    • so_pitted_wabam@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Omg, that is insane! Imagine coming home from work like

      “Honey, I dropped the baby off at the fire station today and the fireman yelled ‘BACK BACK NO TRADE BACK’ when I handed it over, so I’m pretty sure the decision is final. I hope you weren’t too attached to the babe.”

      • Hozerkiller@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        “I dropped Billy off for camp at the fire station. What do you mean thats next week?”

    • wolfeh@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I’m sure as soon as that toddler goes into a fire, the orange will just disappear into the orange, and that will be that.

      At least, one can hope.

    • AxExRx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      They probably wont fit through the slot.

      I think at that age, you just send them through the front door and call them a volunteer.

      • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I’d be completely comfortable with doing whatever is necessary to make him fit through the slot, except for augmenting the slot in any way.

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Yeah this directly came out of people abandoning babies in all sorts of place. Some places have these nest type of boxes all padded and temperature controlled where people can leave babies. This is the type of good thing I could see today republicans rallying to stop.

  • robocall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I thought you had to fill out a form or identify yourself or they’d do DNA on the baby to identify you. But this says parents can remain nameless. I’m not sure what that entails.

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Literally no questions asked. A lot of fire stations even have special temperature-controlled compartments with alarms connected so that people can drop their baby off without even being seen.

    • so_pitted_wabam@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Yeah from what I understand you can pull up, say the magic words, give no documentation of any type, then leave without the baby

      • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 minutes ago

        That seems like it would open up a whole can of worms when, a decade later, your kid should be starting school. They ask you where he is and you have no documentation of what happened to him. Don’t they start asking serious legal questions about your “missing” kid, and accusing you of foul play?

      • WraithGear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        this is important to prevent the issue of mothers leaving their babies in the dumpster instead. it’s sad they grow up an orphan, but better then the alternative by a mile.

      • emeralddawn45@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I assume they’re referring to the pro-life movement being responsible for creating a whole bunch of unwanted pregnancies/children because of their opposition to birth control measures and abortion. I also assume they are being sarcastic.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          19 hours ago

          And I’ve not met many men with 10 kids who are super into doing the whole “dividing the labor of parenting evenly” thing, and I went to catholic schools, I knew some big families. And even if he had been the type to do that, you aren’t winding up being the breadwinner for a family with 10 kids and having both low stress finances and a low stress job. So adding in lots of extra home duties and possibly reduced financial capabilities and mourning will probably wreck you.

          That said, I’ve never met a family that large where the parents kept actually parenting beyond number 3 or 4. Some of the most horrifically parentified people I ever met were middle daughters of large families. Also the kids are struggling too, and each of them is likely to have taken some lasting psychic damage from being abandoned by their dad, even temporarily, shortly after their mom died.

            • [deleted]@piefed.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              21 hours ago

              As long as we are doing hypothetical, he may have been working long hours to pay for all the costs while she was stay at home. When she died, working all the time and trying to care for kids and grieving is going to be massively stressful. Bot to mention the aunt for 7 of the kids decided to have a custody battle so lots and lots of possible things leading to being overwhelmed.

              But you clearly assume he is a deadbeat because he’s a man. Have fun with that.

                • [deleted]@piefed.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  18 hours ago

                  Because he didn’t do Jack raising them probably

                  Would you have assumed the same lack of parenting if the father had died and the mother dropped off the kids?

  • mvilain@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    22 hours ago

    It’s better than leaving them in some men’s room baby changing station with the sign “Place sacrifice here” sign taped to it.

    • so_pitted_wabam@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Better for most, but the rest area demon who is sustained on changing station sacrifices really hates this law.

  • hexdream@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    24 hours ago

    You know, a flight from overseas is expensive to do this, but you got to look at the long term savings…