• Sanctus@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    176
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    24 days ago

    You’re not lying. You are printing it as a PDF. Your electronic buddy doesn’t see a difference.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      68
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      Beyond that, also, what’s so hard about clicking on “File > Export As… > PDF” which is literally in the file menu on LibreOffice at the very least. I don’t know about MS Office, but I would assume it’s the same.

      • Railcar8095@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        24 days ago

        I’m going to assume you’re on the younger side. That’s a relatively recent thing. For many many years we had to install PDF printers.

        Also the PDF printer is generic, but the export has to implemented for each application individually.

        • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          24 days ago

          I’m in my forties. The post we are talking about was made in February 2026. Priyanka Lakhara definitely looks younger than me, didn’t even make her Twitter account until January 2024.

          What does age or how it worked in the past have to do with a post made… four days ago by someone who is either late twenties to mid-thirties at most?

          Also, in those old timey wimey years I was just pirating Adobe Acrobat.

          • Railcar8095@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            24 days ago

            The age comment is not about the age of the posts, but about how you seem so surprised about printing as PDF rather than export as PDF.

            Using a virtual printer was the norm until relatively recently, and even then it’s still the most effective because anything than can print can use that to generate a PDF.

            That’s how I still create PDFs honestly.

            Didn’t want you offend, sorry if came out wrong

            • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              24 days ago

              No offense taken, just confused because I never had this many problems with PDFs, but as I said, I was pirating Adobe Acrobat for a long, long time so maybe I just didn’t run into as many issues.

      • BCsven@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        23 days ago

        Heh, we were doing some cosigner banking and I asks my one adult kid to send me the bank documents needed (they were pdf files on their computer). They sent me low res screen shots. Lol

    • rainwall@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      This is as much linguistic tomfoolery for humans as it is a con for computers.

      I dont know the history, but the most likely case is some microsoft engineer implemented the “print as pdf” option to get around an adobe restriction in the far past, and now we have this weird convention where you can “print” to only 1 filetype to “save” it.

      • someguy3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        24 days ago

        Someone else pointed out that printing to pdf was a universal solution no matter the program. Instead of each program having to make their own export option.

        • rainwall@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          24 days ago

          Thats not 100% correct. This didnt use to be an option, nor is pdf the default printing “format” used by printers. Thats more PCL.

          “Print to pdf” was added to Windows at some point after PDF became a common file format.

          • someguy3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            24 days ago

            What? I’m saying it was added because it was independent of the program. You could print to pdf from anywhere be it word, or notepad, or tax software, or a browser, or whatever shitty proprietary program you had. Instead of waiting for each of those programs to add an export as PDF option. I have no idea what you misinterpreted that into.

    • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      23 days ago

      Postscript (not the P in PDF, even though I think it should have been) is how Portable Document Format is made.

      PostScript’s original purpose was for formatting documents to print with laser printers, but to also interpret font hinting and display features for lower resolution printing. But it required printers to process them before rasterization.

      It was so good at this that it made sense to also use it for the much lower resolution of computer screens once computers were powerful enough to do the rasterization themselves. Hence the PDF replacing most .PS (PostScript) files, unless you were a graphic design student in the late 90s.

    • tomiant@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      24 days ago

      When you are saving it as a .txt file, you are printing it as a .txt file, the computer sees no difference.

        • tomiant@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          24 days ago

          I’m sorry but I am the head of printing operations at work and I can assure you, that is exactly how computers work.

          • Sanctus@anarchist.nexus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            24 days ago

            Oh! Apologies sir. I didn’t realize you were the one casting the printer summoning seances from that side of the veil. You know if you ever need support you can draw out the four runes on the back of the book.

      • jaybone@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        24 days ago

        I haven’t looked at the printer driver interface on various different operating systens, but I imagine programmatically you don’t write ACSII text directly to it, the way you would with file io calls. Though on Linux you have “lpr” where you can pipe text directly to the command. It’s possible a printer could natively support this, but clearly it would be a different interface to render anything more complex than ascii text.