Western civilization is on its way to collapse but not for the reasons he thinks… It’s so absurd because his existence and his politics as well as others like him are some of the leading causes of western collapse.

Ah yes, the notoriously left wing BBC… My eyes are rolling so hard they may fall out of my head.

Enough projection for an IMAX theater.

Oh yeah random WhatsApp numbers totally aren’t associated with scams in any way whatsoever.

Weird right-alignment, weird punctuation. These aren’t hallmarks of trying to avoid spam filters at all. Also nothing unusual about an entirely new user account that was just made to post these identical posts and that the name of the account is “cashteam.” Nothing to see here, folks!

No scams, no fake promises

Well all righty then, that’s all I needed to know… …to report your ass. Get the fuck out of here

Absolutely, which was my point. That the tooth thing wasn’t “only two years ago” it’s actually been in the research and development process for probably over 15 years at this point, with a long way to go.

https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physiology/articles/10.3389/fphys.2014.00036/full

It’s been in the works for over ten years. Here is a paper on research into it from 2014.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3000521/

Here’s another one from 2010.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1882761608000070#cesec60

And another from 2008.

Potentially even one or two tech companies that have been around for decades depending on how large it gets before that burst.

Please be Microsoft, please be Microsoft, please be Microsoft.

Who are these twelve fuckheads who are gonna fuck this all up? I want fucking names CNN! Of course they leave out the important information about which Senators need to get hammered with calls from their constituents to not give up!

Just do what Republicans in other states do… never make new maps and then just use these maps anyway because oops too late.

“This is democracy manifest!”

Oh so the Business Plot all over again, huh?

Sometimes you just cant beat the classics.

I’m not against different relationship arrangements and it’s often argued that you shouldn’t dump all your emotional needs on one person.

However… That being said the more people you add to the mix the more complex and more emotional energy you have to dictate to the situation. A lot of people are genuinely not ready for such a thing even if they think they are. Because while you might have mor emotional needs met, you’re also faced with higher emotional and social demands from your partners. Some people don’t seem to understand that you can’t avoid giving more of your emotional self to others when you give it to more than one person. In my experience, some of the people pursuing these kind of relationships are actually seeking less personal emotional investment, and I think that grossly misunderstands the situation and is a bit selfish, at best.

I think these situations can be healthy, but I also think healthy ones are more rare, just like healthy traditional relationships are often rare.

Finally, I am not shocked at people opening up to the idea of throuples when two parents can barely afford to raise a child. Three incomes starts to take the weight of the financial cost off just a little. Not a lot, but a little.

Honk.

They increased because Obama legalized and normalized the worst excesses of the Bush admin and gave those powers to subsequent presidencies. But sure let’s stand up more for the guy who said “we need to look forward, not backward” when it came to prosecuting the Bush admin for war crimes, and then wondering why no one would stop Trump from criming all his presidency when we couldn’t even lift a finger for war crimes.

I’m not saying Obama is a villain, but he fucked up in some very major ways on those issues.

There’s going to be an enforcement step, right?

The judge will vigorously wag their finger at the Trump administration and admonish them with a politely written letter.

Maybe they’ll even threaten to count to three or hold their breath.

It remained unclear how the Trump administration might proceed — or, potentially, if it might appeal the ruling.

Oh FUCK OFF New York Times. They’re just going to ignore the court order and maybe eventually appeal it. Like they’ve been doing for 9 god damned months now. Take this weak attempts at impartiality and shove them up your printing press.

Trump’s superstar charisma.

I’m so sick of people saying this dipshit with diarrhea of the mouth is charismatic.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41928-025-01477-0

Here’s the paper published in Nature.

However, it’s worth noting that Nature has had to retract studies before:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nature_(journal)#Retractions

From 2000 to 2001, a series of five fraudulent papers by Jan Hendrik Schön was published in Nature. The papers, about semiconductors, were revealed to contain falsified data and other scientific fraud. In 2003, Nature retracted the papers. The Schön scandal was not limited to Nature; other prominent journals, such as Science and Physical Review, also retracted papers by Schön.

Not saying that we shouldn’t trust anything published in scientific journals, but yes, we should wait until more studies that replicate these results exist before jumping to conclusions.

Oh yeah, it’s a joy to watch, regardless of how little we should trust them.