• AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 days ago

    For anyone else trying to follow this research, the article is describing the paper by Moody et al. from a year and a half ago.

  • [deleted]@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    Is the article missing words?

    While the Cambrian Explosion kickstarted complex life in a major way some 530 million years, the true timeline of life on Earth is much longer. For years, scientists have estimated that LUCA likely arrived on the scene some 4 billion years, which is only 600 million years after the planet’s formation.

    530 million years ago? 530 million years after the earth formed?

    4 billion years ago?

      • Applesause@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        until the ai carches on and starts intentionally making mistakes to pass our new turing test better than we can

    • dontsayaword@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Since the 4 billion years is contrasted with 600 million years after rhe planet formed, I assume they meant “years ago”. Very unclear though.

  • zabadoh@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    …scientists still don’t understand how life evolved from its very origins to the early communities of which LUCA is a part.

    Failure of alien biocontainment systems. Or maybe deliberate life seeding. Or hitchhiking enclosed ecosystem, like a biosphere, on a meteorite.