• CircaV@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    So the US is at the stage where whatever this orange jerkoff farts out of his decrepit dementia-riddled mind - becomes law? And aligned states will listen to this pap, non-aligned states will Ignore? Cause ruling by EOs like isn’t a thing

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Is it me or is the Cheetos purposely driving the US into a civil war? Like, I would immediately believe it of evidence shows up that trump was paid by Putin to kill the US, but the more and more o see him doing this shit, I really believe he’s purposely trying to wreck that shit hole country

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      You mean those things that Republicans always whine about when some law comes on place that is good for everyone?

      Yeah those van go fuck themselves

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      In the trash, along with free speech absolutism and freedom of and from religion, concern about deficits, and so on…the cons have always lied about their so-called concerns and principles.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    sTaTeS rIgHts *

    *does not apply to Democrats or people trying to protect human rights within a state if it conflicts with right wing authoritarians’ vision for how everyone else should live.

    • fodor@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 days ago

      Well no, because this order has zero legal weight. They are liars, though, for pretending it does.

    • CosmicTurtle0 [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      7 days ago

      Conservatives have always been fine with federal government taking away other states rights.

      The civil war started because the South didn’t want the federal government to force them to stop using slaves but 100% okay with the federal government forcing Northern states to return slaves back to the South.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      The cons whine about things like gender fluidity, but they’ve always been quite morally fluid, let’s say…

  • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    7 days ago

    Correct me if I’m wrong but isn’t this effectively toothless? Like executive orders only effect things directly under federal and more specifically executive purview meaning even a city government could pass a regulation on AI in their area and it’d have more legal weight than an executive order. Or are they abusing unrelated powers to declare that no one can regulate AI?

    Like I’m pretty sure the supremacy clause doesn’t apply to executive orders.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      More specifically, they’re just directives to federal employees. It’s the equivalent of your boss telling you how to do your job.

      • lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        They can write a law or they might as well eat that paper after he signs it, because it’s jus like him:

        w o r t h l e s s

    • fodor@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yes, you are correct. A federal law would preempt a state law, usually. But this is not a federal law, so it’s a load of kindling.

  • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    7 days ago

    So are they saying AI is a national security threat? Or that living without AI is a national security threat, in which one would imagine AI should be provided free access by the federal government to every person, as it is a threat to not have access? As an executive order is designed to be used only for an issue of national security, which we must have been living in such a threat since the country was founded until now.