Correct me if I’m wrong but isn’t this effectively toothless? Like executive orders only effect things directly under federal and more specifically executive purview meaning even a city government could pass a regulation on AI in their area and it’d have more legal weight than an executive order. Or are they abusing unrelated powers to declare that no one can regulate AI?
Like I’m pretty sure the supremacy clause doesn’t apply to executive orders.
Correct me if I’m wrong but isn’t this effectively toothless? Like executive orders only effect things directly under federal and more specifically executive purview meaning even a city government could pass a regulation on AI in their area and it’d have more legal weight than an executive order. Or are they abusing unrelated powers to declare that no one can regulate AI?
Like I’m pretty sure the supremacy clause doesn’t apply to executive orders.
Yes, you are correct. A federal law would preempt a state law, usually. But this is not a federal law, so it’s a load of kindling.
More specifically, they’re just directives to federal employees. It’s the equivalent of your boss telling you how to do your job.
Telecommunication is controlled by the Federal government.
They can write a law or they might as well eat that paper after he signs it, because it’s jus like him:
w o r t h l e s s