Lunch atop a Skyscraper is a black-and-white photograph taken on September 20, 1932, of eleven ironworkers sitting on a steel beam of the RCA Building, 850 feet (260 meters) above the ground during the construction of Rockefeller Center in Manhattan, New York City. It was a staged photograph arranged as a publicity stunt, part of a campaign promoting the skyscraper.
Sadly the original image was just capitalist propaganda. Impressive yes, but an entirely manufactured celebration of the worker for cynical advertising reasons.
That’s the first paragraph of the wikipedia article about the image, you dork.
congratulations: after researching how you fucked up, you quoted wikipedia. then got mad at me for calling you out. BTW, explicitly describing how I’m right for calling you out as AI bullshit by explicitlyadmitting that I’m right… You’re Trump, and you can’t mass-gaslight like he does
well, I guess today is the first day I see an AI bot cry.
But you called out a direct quote taken from wikipedia as AI bullshit - you did exactly the thing I just described. Also, show me where I admitted something? You neglected that in your reply just now. It’s pretty important.
Just… look we can all see that you misidentified a legitimate quote as having been written by an AI, attacked me over it (sure fair enough, AI slop shouldn’t be here, just you know… make sure it is slop before you pull the trigger), and now it’s spiraling. It happens, people make mistakes. Just take the L and move on.
your Tu Quoque only works on those stupid enough to listen to you.
the rest of us know to ignore the silly things you say…
edit: you lost this argument hours ago. the fact that you keep coming back just to be proven wrong, repeatedly, only proves - additionally - that you are so insecure, that you can’t accept the reality that you’re wrong. children can do this, but you can’t. :(
but, please, keep amusing me with the silly things you say
They’re doing it all over the place just now, I’m genuinely kinda worried since their post history shows them to be a dick but not a complete toon like how they’re behaving here…
Sadly the original image was just capitalist propaganda. Impressive yes, but an entirely manufactured celebration of the worker for cynical advertising reasons.
I don’t know why you thought that AI garbage was a rational argument, but you gotta learn somehow that such crap isn’t welcome here
That’s the first paragraph of the wikipedia article about the image, you dork.
congratulations: after researching how you fucked up, you quoted wikipedia. then got mad at me for calling you out. BTW, explicitly describing how I’m right for calling you out as AI bullshit by explicitly admitting that I’m right… You’re Trump, and you can’t mass-gaslight like he does
well, I guess today is the first day I see an AI bot cry.
first time for everything…>
Are you implying that wikipedia article is AI, or… wait where’d I even admit anything?
… Dude are you okay? This is unhinged.
if you want to hallucinate something I definitely didn’t say, then, sure-- you can hallucinate whatever you want.
back here in reality, none of that ever happened.
But you called out a direct quote taken from wikipedia as AI bullshit - you did exactly the thing I just described. Also, show me where I admitted something? You neglected that in your reply just now. It’s pretty important.
Just… look we can all see that you misidentified a legitimate quote as having been written by an AI, attacked me over it (sure fair enough, AI slop shouldn’t be here, just you know… make sure it is slop before you pull the trigger), and now it’s spiraling. It happens, people make mistakes. Just take the L and move on.
your Tu Quoque only works on those stupid enough to listen to you.
the rest of us know to ignore the silly things you say…
edit: you lost this argument hours ago. the fact that you keep coming back just to be proven wrong, repeatedly, only proves - additionally - that you are so insecure, that you can’t accept the reality that you’re wrong. children can do this, but you can’t. :(
but, please, keep amusing me with the silly things you say
My initial comment, as of posting, was 53 minutes ago. Seriously are you okay? Time skips are no joke and this is really erratic behavior.
(er also, no, asking someone to support their claims isn’t an attempt to highlight their supposed hypocrisy)
What the heck are you talking about?
I am so confused here. 😂
I feel like I’m reading a drunk version of IBM’s Watson. Guess he’s fallen on hard times after ChatGPT became the new fad…
They’re doing it all over the place just now, I’m genuinely kinda worried since their post history shows them to be a dick but not a complete toon like how they’re behaving here…
I can’t even load their post history… did their account get nuked?
ah, so you admit you don’t know any of this-- exactly as I’ve stated
did you think that admitting I’m correct and that you’re an obvious lying poser was going to work out for you?
lol
… uh buddy I think you got the wrong person here.
Removed by mod
What advice would that be?