(Update)

  • watson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    That’s the first paragraph of the wikipedia article about the image, you dork.

    congratulations: after researching how you fucked up, you quoted wikipedia. then got mad at me for calling you out. BTW, explicitly describing how I’m right for calling you out as AI bullshit by explicitly admitting that I’m right… You’re Trump, and you can’t mass-gaslight like he does

    well, I guess today is the first day I see an AI bot cry.

    first time for everything…>

    • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Are you implying that wikipedia article is AI, or… wait where’d I even admit anything?

      … Dude are you okay? This is unhinged.

      • watson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        if you want to hallucinate something I definitely didn’t say, then, sure-- you can hallucinate whatever you want.

        back here in reality, none of that ever happened.

        • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          But you called out a direct quote taken from wikipedia as AI bullshit - you did exactly the thing I just described. Also, show me where I admitted something? You neglected that in your reply just now. It’s pretty important.

          Just… look we can all see that you misidentified a legitimate quote as having been written by an AI, attacked me over it (sure fair enough, AI slop shouldn’t be here, just you know… make sure it is slop before you pull the trigger), and now it’s spiraling. It happens, people make mistakes. Just take the L and move on.

          • watson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            your Tu Quoque only works on those stupid enough to listen to you.

            the rest of us know to ignore the silly things you say…

            edit: you lost this argument hours ago. the fact that you keep coming back just to be proven wrong, repeatedly, only proves - additionally - that you are so insecure, that you can’t accept the reality that you’re wrong. children can do this, but you can’t. :(

            but, please, keep amusing me with the silly things you say

            • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Hours ago

              My initial comment, as of posting, was 53 minutes ago. Seriously are you okay? Time skips are no joke and this is really erratic behavior.

              (er also, no, asking someone to support their claims isn’t an attempt to highlight their supposed hypocrisy)