(Update)

  • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    But you called out a direct quote taken from wikipedia as AI bullshit - you did exactly the thing I just described. Also, show me where I admitted something? You neglected that in your reply just now. It’s pretty important.

    Just… look we can all see that you misidentified a legitimate quote as having been written by an AI, attacked me over it (sure fair enough, AI slop shouldn’t be here, just you know… make sure it is slop before you pull the trigger), and now it’s spiraling. It happens, people make mistakes. Just take the L and move on.

    • watson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      your Tu Quoque only works on those stupid enough to listen to you.

      the rest of us know to ignore the silly things you say…

      edit: you lost this argument hours ago. the fact that you keep coming back just to be proven wrong, repeatedly, only proves - additionally - that you are so insecure, that you can’t accept the reality that you’re wrong. children can do this, but you can’t. :(

      but, please, keep amusing me with the silly things you say

      • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Hours ago

        My initial comment, as of posting, was 53 minutes ago. Seriously are you okay? Time skips are no joke and this is really erratic behavior.

        (er also, no, asking someone to support their claims isn’t an attempt to highlight their supposed hypocrisy)