- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
You must log in or # to comment.
Not the people whose content they stole and jobs they’ve destroyed, not even their employees who made it happen.
You might think that nothing of value would be lost, but did you account for the steel beam?
That much steel is worth a good bit.
Yeah, they might land on someone with value!
it’s a good thing that jet fuel hadn’t been invented yet…
Removed by mod
Lunch atop a Skyscraper is a black-and-white photograph taken on September 20, 1932, of eleven ironworkers sitting on a steel beam of the RCA Building, 850 feet (260 meters) above the ground during the construction of Rockefeller Center in Manhattan, New York City. It was a staged photograph arranged as a publicity stunt, part of a campaign promoting the skyscraper.
Sadly the original image was just capitalist propaganda. Impressive yes, but an entirely manufactured celebration of the worker for cynical advertising reasons.
I don’t know why you thought that AI garbage was a rational argument, but you gotta learn somehow that such crap isn’t welcome here
I don’t know why you thought that AI garbage was a rational argument, but you gotta learn somehow that such crap isn’t welcome here
That’s the first paragraph of the wikipedia article about the image, you dork.
That’s the first paragraph of the wikipedia article about the image, you dork.
congratulations: after researching how you fucked up, you quoted wikipedia. then got mad at me for calling you out. BTW, explicitly describing how I’m right for calling you out as AI bullshit by explicitly admitting that I’m right… You’re Trump, and you can’t mass-gaslight like he does
well, I guess today is the first day I see an AI bot cry.
first time for everything…>
Are you implying that wikipedia article is AI, or… wait where’d I even admit anything?
… Dude are you okay? This is unhinged.
if you want to hallucinate something I definitely didn’t say, then, sure-- you can hallucinate whatever you want.
back here in reality, none of that ever happened.
But you called out a direct quote taken from wikipedia as AI bullshit - you did exactly the thing I just described. Also, show me where I admitted something? You neglected that in your reply just now. It’s pretty important.
Just… look we can all see that you misidentified a legitimate quote as having been written by an AI, attacked me over it (sure fair enough, AI slop shouldn’t be here, just you know… make sure it is slop before you pull the trigger), and now it’s spiraling. It happens, people make mistakes. Just take the L and move on.
What the heck are you talking about?
I am so confused here. 😂
I feel like I’m reading a drunk version of IBM’s Watson. Guess he’s fallen on hard times after ChatGPT became the new fad…
ah, so you admit you don’t know any of this-- exactly as I’ve stated
did you think that admitting I’m correct and that you’re an obvious lying poser was going to work out for you?
lol
… uh buddy I think you got the wrong person here.
deleted by creator
