• ryper@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    133
    ·
    1 day ago

    In a brief order, the conservative majority argued, among other things, that the District Court had intervened to block the maps too close to next year’s midterm election.

    Eleven months away is too close to the next election for these clowns.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      83
      ·
      1 day ago

      The decision has nothing to do with their stated reasons; they are in favor of racism, but don’t want to say so

    • HocEnimVeni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      1 day ago

      Dont forget 9 months is too close to an election to approve a supreme court justice nomination, unless the president is Republican and then less than a month is plenty of time

      • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Election was already underway. There were already absentee balls cast ousting him from office when they approved his nomination

      • Fredselfish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        1 day ago

        Same bullshit that Mitch McConnell claimed why Obama couldn’t appoint a Supreme Court justice fuck this illegmeaite Supreme Court.

        • TacoSocks@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          And then did a speed run to install a Supreme Court Justice like 45 days before an election under Trump.

    • akilou@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 day ago

      But wouldn’t the opposite be true? Changing the maps too close to the election is a problem. “Keeping them the same too close to the election” makes no sense.

    • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      No no, dont even give it that much dignity. The complainants are not asking to “block the map” too close (11 months) to elections. They are asking that the map not be illicit, unethically changed 5 years early, based off the explicit public request of the President who is not meant to have power over state election matters, with the explicitly stated intent of gerrymandering out more seats for Republicans that they “deserve” than they otherwise would have won, only 15ish months to the elections (which is apparently plenty of time). Their “reasoning” doesn’t make sense because it’s not reasoning. It’s blatant full chested support of voter suppression/disenfranchisement to bolster their party and their autocratic President. They’re so full of shit you could smell them talking from the next room over. Fuck those lying, cheating, corrupt, un-American, fascist cunts.

    • credo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 day ago

      Texas passed their new maps on August 29th. On November 18 the district court ordered them to revert to their previous maps.

      Apparently the SC’s Republican cult members think this will be too difficult for Texas?