Actually, that is a myth. “In matters of taste” was never part of the original saying. One theory was that it was coined as an alternative to the “buyer beware” mentality.
This is probably apocryphal. No evidence that guy said that quote according to Snopes.
https://www.snopes.com/articles/468815/customer-is-always-right-origin/
And it’s really about what you stock in a store.
If a bunch of customers want to buy an ugly hat, you should keep that hat in inventory.
Also the ‘in matters of taste’ does not fit in every occasion.
If you order an expensive bottle of wine you can’t return it because you don’t like it. The trading ritual exists to make sure the wine doesn’t have a defect. If the wine is fine but not too your taste, well then that’s bad luck.
I thought that until the day a french friend of mine sent a bottle back because he didn’t like it. I’m still not over the audacity of that moment
Depends a bit in how often they sell the particular bottle and if they do wine by the glass.
But if you order a Romanée Conti you will pay for it.
“Just one bad apple!” One bad apple spoils the entire barrel/bunch.
“Jack of all trades, master of none.” Jack of all trades, master of none, oft times better than a master of one.
“Great minds think alike.” Great minds think alike, but fools never differ.
Fun fact. The jack of all trades idiom has evolved and been added to over the centuries. Here the conclusion of an analysis from stack exchange
Conclusions
To sum up, I offer this timeline of the earliest occurrences I could find for the various forms of jack of all trades and the proverbial phrases built up around it:
1618 Jack-of-all-trades 1631 Tom of all Trades 1639 John-of-all-trades 1721 Jack of all trades, and it would seem, Good at none 1732 Jack of all Trades is of no Trade 1741 Jack of all trades, and in truth, master of none 1785 a Jack of all trades, but master of none 1930 a Jack of all trades and a master of one 2007 Jack of all trades, master of none, though ofttimes better than master of oneThe extra-long version of the expression may be considerably older than the 2007 earliest established occurrence might suggest—perhaps even a decade or two older. But it isn’t the original form of the expression; and in comparison with the forms that arose during the 1700s, it is quite young.
Time flies when the full quote is “time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana”
“Blood is thicker than water” is actually “the blood of the covenant is thicker than the water of the womb”
No it isn’t, someone on Tumblr just made that up
That’s not the full quote and before internet smart arses decided that every single idiom needed a fake “original full version” it didn’t exist.
The point of the phrase is not literal though. Customer service means pleasing the customer, which means you sometimes have to act like they’re right even if they’re wrong.
Seems like the actual quote was:
Assume that the customer is right until it is plain beyond all question he is not.
But “the customer is always right” (by itself) was even their ad slogan.
Imagine “well actuallying” someone with a lie then posting it as a fact for everyone to repeat all over the internet for years. There is no direct origin and no proof that Selfridge even said it at all.
Even if Selfridge’s entire existence were a collective fever dream*, the “full quote” is the better quote.
I can’t imagine anyone who has worked in direct sales, at any amount of money, who genuinely believes “the customer is always right” is more correct of a saying without “in matters of taste”.
*
If everyone born before 1925 was a fever dream, it changes literally nothing about the state of the world today.
There is no evidence that this “full quote” exists.
Source:
https://www.snopes.com/articles/468815/customer-is-always-right-origin/Yes there is, and I’ve brought a source.
https://vger.to/piefed.blahaj.zone/c/memes/p/426525/i-ve-always-said-this
Everything should be as simple as possible, but not simpler.
Everything should be as simple as possible,
but not simpler./s
That special place in super hell, though?
Head of carnival design and pleasure department
