• tym@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    21 hours ago

    You realize you think like them and they think like you, right? Dehumanizing someone unequivocally and wishing ill upon them is the easy and default human condition you find yourself living in right now.

    • NeilBrü@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Ah, the age-old dilemma: is it morally sound and/or necessary to dehumanize dehumanizers?

      And if we’re honest, isn’t dehumanizing people a very human trait?

      Or put my favorite way: “No one hates like family.”

    • Akuchimoya@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      Historically, the mongers of violence and war have only been ended by stronger violence and better war strategies and resources. The whole take the higher road and tolerance thing is what got America into this current mess in the first place. These assholes are cowards and only come out when there are no consequences, but go back into hiding when there are.

      People should not be punched in the nose for their race, religion, sexuality, gender, etc., basically who they are. People should be punched in the noise for being assholes, their bad behaviour.

      • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        There are several sets of people involved. First you have the ambitious. These are poloticians and such that probably aren’t really racist at the core, but are willing to act and be racist to get ahead. They are the real problem. But it isn’t hate that drives them. It’s ambition. For the people suffering, that doesn’t matter. But when it comes to solving the problem it does.

        Then you have the people who are actually racist, hateful people. They do exist, but they are actually a very small minority. The rest are “followers”. They weren’t racist until someone convinced them to be. These are the people you can give better options to. Doing so errodes the power of the other two groups.

        But where we are now… I feel like you might be right about a need for responding in kind. But, while doing so, remembering that overall, the follower group is not an enemy that should be eradicated, but one that showed be turned to a better side. So it’s kind of like making sure you don’t box them in and give them no way out but to fight. You need the followers to join you while you overpower the other two groups. And after, you need to make sure the followers have better options so that they don’t join up with the next popularist to appear.

    • bagsy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      i do realize that and it weighs on me, and i hate it, but i refuse to tolerate intolerance.

      I am fully willing to have rational conversations with maga, but after trying 100s of times and making no progress, i see no reason to continue with the olive branch. i would have better luck teaching my dog mandrin, than making maga see reason or have empathy.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Exactly. Some of these people are literally our fucking parents, and even they refuse to listen to reason.

        They are lost.

      • tym@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        It’s a fascinating social construct: Once enough chronological years are accumulated, expertise is expected. Obviously though, points at everything, that’s a fallacy. They’re literally clinically retarded. It’s uncouthe to fight the retarded.