• xxce2AAb@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    112
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Grok - By Pedos For Pedos™.

    Edit: Also:

    xAI, the company that developed Grok, responds to CBC: ‘Legacy Media Lies’

    Isn’t that the second time in as many days they’ve responded with exactly that vapid asinine mantra to a perfectly reasonable press inquiry?

    Checked and yes. Yes, it is:

    When I asked the company about the site, an anonymous spokesperson responded only with the message “Legacy Media Lies.”

    Source

    Christ. They’re all smoking crack.

  • falseWhite@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    You’re driving a nazi-mobile that’s pre-loaded with a pedo nazi bot. What did you expect??

    It’s kinda “I told you so”. Why the fuck are people using Nazi Elon products?

  • Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 days ago

    I feel the need to remind everyone that Elon musk likes to rp as his toddlers and then in character, makes sexualized comments.

    • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Not sending nudes is totally woke, dude. When you’re talkin to the Gorkster, the conversation might not be “politically correct” but if you don’t want me teaching your kids about the “real” world then you shouldn’t be driving a Tesla. Rock on, [Old Norse slur that roughly translates to “war captive”]!

  • FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Now, Melon Usk is a dick and Xwitter and Grok can go eff themselves. And at the same time: the mother has worked as a journalist, had given no consideration to which of the “personalities” of Grok to choose to let her offspring talk to in her Tesla, had neither engaged the NSFW nor the child mode settings. In her defense, she didn’t let the kid do this unattended. And of course the chatbot should not ask no one for nudes. Or genocide. Or any of the other missteps this version of so-called AI has made already.

    I’m having a real hard time to picking only one side to blame here. Even if you’re not a journalist, you must have picked up enough stuff by osmosis to know that this isn’t something you should let your kid do without prior research and a look at the settings available.

    • FigMcLargeHuge@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Even if you’re not a journalist, you must have picked up enough stuff by osmosis to know that this isn’t something you should let your kid do without prior research and a look at the settings available.

      The sheer amount of toddlers I see being babysat by a tablet, even while parents are doing something as mundane as shopping, says otherwise.

      • FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        I think that’s a little unfair. They are not babysat, they’re being distracted. And do you inspect every tablet to see if maybe the parents went to great lengths to curate suitable content and a child friendly walled garden? Not every tablet is unfiltered access to grooming chatbots.

        • FigMcLargeHuge@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          Gotcha. Here’s my experience with tech and kids. When my kids were younger I set up one machine in the house that they could use to access the internet, and on that machine I ran a reverse proxy. They each had 10 websites I would verify and whitelist. They all could access whitelisted websites as I didn’t filter it down to each kid, they just all got 10 sites I would allow, and if that was a problem we could have easily discussed it and modified the number. It was just an arbitrary starting point. Now my kids were fine with it, wife and step kids weren’t fine with my level of restriction but whatever. It caused some arguments but my bio kids knew that’s how it was going to be at my house.

          I truly feel for parents today as it is much harder to lock things down and keep on top of things like this especially as their kids get older. Maybe I just think that they should use different ways to distract them at such early ages. I definitely don’t pretend to have the answers to any of this, and can only go by my prior experience and feelings about the matter.

          • FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            I used to be more judgmental about this stuff too. Having little terrorists of my own has mellowed me. I do prefer a kid watching YouTube videos on a tablet over the kid throwing a temper tantrum at the cafe. All parents need a break. And I feel like if my parents had had the opportunity to let me watch sesame street on a handheld device in the 80s at a restaurant, they would have in a heartbeat. There were for sure other grownups heavily judging my folks for allowing me to play Tetris on the Gameboy in the 90s while we waited for our food! And I still managed to get a bachelor’s degree.

            At the same time, they thought watching too much TV wouldn’t be good for you and I don’t think that has turned out the way they feared. All gamers would automatically become sociopathic killers and they didn’t. I do think “social” media has proven to be detrimental. But the internet is vaster than that BS. Most pacifying tablet use will not turn kids’ brains into a rotting mess.

            And as they get older you need to have numerous talks. The sex one, the online predator one, now the weird AI/chatbot one, the one that contextualizes pornography and other disturbing shit on the internet one. And at a certain point, maybe 16 or thereabouts, you have to let go and hope for the best. They will find all this stuff anyway. You probably did as well. I know I did. The only thing that has changed is ease of availability for most of this stuff. So that’s what we need to prepare them for and then cross our fingers.

            • FigMcLargeHuge@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              You are correct. My kids are older now and productive citizens. As a gamer myself, they always had access to the latest gaming consoles and all of my older equipment. I never had a problem with them playing as that would have been very hypocritical of me. I think my feelings about kids and tablets are the ages of these kids I see. Very young to be handed a tablet, but I guess you could argue that they won’t be behind when they are forced to use tech like in class. Which is very different than when I grew up. I got an F on a paper once because I did it on a computer. Printed it on a dot matrix and the teacher accused me of cheating because I used a computer. Pissed my Dad off so much he went and bought an Atari 1027 printer which was a letter quality printer so the teacher couldn’t tell that it wasn’t done on a typewriter. Much different times than now where kids are required to use computers. I will be long gone by then, but it would be wild to get to look at society 50 years from now and see how things have changed.

  • Grimy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    3 days ago

    https://www.instagram.com/p/DP7cHrOD3ha/?l=1

    This was her video. To be honest, it’s clearly not meant to be kid friendly. I guess they should have a warning or something but I’m sick and tired of this puritanical bullshit tbh.

    Every journalist out there trying to get a Pulitzer about the “bad things the AI said to me”. Now we’re in an environment were every AI needs to be ultra censored, it’s sucking the joy out of it. We aren’t all twelve year olds.

    • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      I guess they should have a warning or something but I’m sick and tired of this puritanical bullshit tbh.

      Ugh, I can’t believe the Puritans are upset about the chat bot asking a child to send nude pictures of himself! What will these pearl-clutchers get upset by next?

      it’s sucking the joy out of it

      Good. Go watch some jangling keys, it’ll be exactly as mentally stimulating and destroy less of the environment.

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Wait until kids learn there is porn on the internet and we have to ban it all. Same vibe.

        Bullshit censorship laws are always riding a “protect the children” monkey. It’s an easy way to get people riled up

        • Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          To summarize, you believe it’s acceptable for company bots to ask preteens for pornographic images of themselves, and anyone opposed to this is a Puritan that wants to ban all porn.

          If this isn’t your view, you have done a terrible job of presenting what you actually believe.

          • Grimy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            It isn’t conscious and doesn’t know the age of the person it’s talking to. It’s literally in a car, clearly it isn’t aimed at kids.

            It’s not good, just clearly blown out of proportion. It’s like a habit, the moment the word AI is in the headline, everybody dog piles and makes a big show of it.