Joined the Mayqueeze.
You moved to Lemmy to ask this question on an account called Ahmed? You sound like a customer service bot?
This is not the reaction of a human being struggling with porn addiction. Let’s just say you have not succeeded in allahing my skepticism.
Not like any other election before where tech companies had zero interests and just thought may the best team win.
A new account, all written in bold, with a potential rage bait about religion and jacking it? I smell bravo sierra.
Radio playlists are a science like marketing. Half the budget is wasted, you’re just never sure which half.
Stations have a target audience. They will have focused grouped this. They know their favorite music, how long on average they listen, and how much they will expect to hear certain artists. The DJs are mere announcers, they have little to no choice in what they play, and they are grateful to have a job. So like anybody working in retail during Christmas, they can tune out the music in their heads.
BUT IF YOU READ IT YOU WILL FIND OUT THAT PEOPLE ARE DIVIDED OVER THIS ISSUE. SO THERE IS NO CONCLUSIVE ANSWER.
Couldn’t have happened to a nicer boss or company.
You’re reading more criticism into that than I really feel. I just answered a question. And my original point was merely that while the article makes it almost sound like this ruling was final, it isn’t. The war will be entering its second battle soon.
Libre Office.
So this was the regional court (Landgericht). The next one is the superior regional court (Oberlandesgericht) where Google will appeal now. Since I don’t see any issues of the Bavarian constitution relevant to this case, the next one up is probably the federal court of justice (Bundesgerichtshof). And there is a small chance that either Google or the courts along the way decide to throw this to the EU court of justice.
Most decisions like this get suspended upon appeal, completely or partially, until people give up or there are no more courts to pester. But every appeal will be taken seriously and goes into review at the court whether there is merit to it. That takes time. And Google has the money for a frivolous tour through the courts. And then there is the danger of court ping-pong where the superior court sends this back with notes to the regional. Whose ruling may be appealed again, etc.
On Lemmy you’re your own algorithm. I assume you already know what you’re thinking.
Google can challenge the court’s ruling. As of writing, Google hasn’t decided whether it will appeal the verdict.
This article is out of date because Google has decided to appeal in the meantime.
This verdict is not legally effective yet. And it may never be. On the high seas and in a German courtroom, the people say, you’re in God’s hand. The next higher court can send this back to the lower court or could overrule it all together. And if they don’t do any of that, Google can go to the next higher court. Every appeal will add anywhere from 6 months to 2 years to the timeline. By the time this gets a final ruling Skynet may have killed us all.
A Canadian singer/songwriter could surely do something with an article talking shit about so-called AI having a so-called AI bullet point summary at the top. Don’t you think?
You are going to run into a self defense deadend there.
And spray paint may be used for graffiti.
Starbucks said it was “deeply sorry for an unacceptable marketing incident”
An unacceptable marketing incident? Like it was thrust upon them. Incidentally, by themselves. The language is baffling although I’m willing to accept it might have sounded less incidental in the original Korean.
Obvs this is very dumb, a bunch of executives are asleep at the wheel, and they probably deserve the 26% drop in revenue for it. The apology needs to be performative and this company-wide, revenue sacrificing history lesson is coincidentally good marketing, I imagine.
That being said, this isn’t really a FuckAI story. Sure, the model suggested a couple of things that only sound great if you’re ignorant of Korean history. But this isn’t a model breaking the sandbox and releasing all company secrets by accident. Or suggesting to help teenagers with ending their lives. This is first and foremost careless managerial conduct. They should have stopped the campaign and even might have if they had bothered to read the email attachments. This could’ve come from a historically ignorant ad agency as well. This is human error, not model madness.
Looking forward to the US Starbucks smashing caffeine explosion campaign that will surely bring the house down in September.
Isn’t it telling that this rage bait is posted by a bot?
I would sooner invest into a really long, reasonably well insulated hose to hang out the nearest window. If you can manage that sub 3 yards and the hose doesn’t dip too much below it’s exhaust vent height, I think this solution might beat DIY ice pack dehumidifiers.
Just do what all other writers have done and choose a starting point and then increment the numbers a bit every time. That horse has not only bolted, it ran past the horizon, had a fulfilling family life, and died of old age.
This is most Americans, no matter what camp they root for, for most of their leaders. And you have plenty to choose from although recently I imagine the Republicans have edged ahead in this depressing horse race. Thank you for rage baiting with us today.
Alibaba picking up Anthropic’s fair use strategy?
Edit: is there an argument for letting the US ruin its economy and environment to train all these models and then just swooping in before it turns into a mild madmaxian hellscape to distill and/or extract the knowledge? Beats having to do this on your own, doesn’t it?