https://www.tuscaloosanews.com/story/news/2005/02/16/violent-video-game-blamed-for-deaths/27880706007/

deleted by creator

I mean, did the code work?

Okay, everyone except you is talking specifically about the word agentic and not agent.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/slang/agentic

It seems pretty clear that it came to prominence last year, so it’s novel now for the majority of the population even though it used to be technical jargon, which is exactly my point.

Im not sure if anybody was using specifically the word “agentic” 50 year ago for software, although it clearly was used in other context from the link. I’m guessing they were mostly saying software agent and the “ic” at the end is relatively new.

I genuinely though segue was spelled like the brand name. I guess you learn something new everyday.

I consider open source already won. Gpt 5 was supposed to be a big step forward but it got smoked in the space of a month. The only thing I’m worried about is the music models.

Meta basically stabbed all the big for profit companies in the back, and now China is walking towards what is left with a revolver. I feel like we got lucky tbh.

It’s novel but not wrong. Plenty of technical terms have inserted themselves into our language over time. I can think of bandwidth and logistics at the top of my head. Catalyst feels very technical as well. Logistics started as military jargon and is brought over from French.

Just thought of Segway as well. Not sure if it started as technical jargon but it’s definitely some weird bastardization.

What’s the game?

The conservative subreddit is already saying the emails show he was actually trying to stop it. The fact that he spent 5 hours with a girl but “didn’t bark” means he is the only saint in the files. The files that “didn’t exist” a few months ago.

I’m pretty sure he could grope children on live tv and his base would still find a way around it.

Nature is amazing but has different constraints and doesn’t always choose the smartest route.

We can use computers, motors and sensors instead of replicating the human body exactly. A lot of startups are failing and there’s a cash grab like always going on, but the tech is rapidly advancing. Boston dynamics for example has an impressive demo up ( https://youtu.be/I44_zbEwz_w ). There’s definitely still a long way to go in any case

Personally, I think it’s really cool (except the fact that it will be quickly weaponized and eventually used against civilian populations)

deleted by creator

If you make a human like robot, then that robot can use everything a human can.

Society is simply already tailored to that form.

In a Fox News interview with Laura Ingraham, Trump declared that the United States is “doing phenomenally well” under his leadership and touted “the greatest economy we’ve ever had.” He claimed prices were falling everywhere except for “beef and coffee.”

The statement in question that led to the comment.

I like him enough as an actor to forgive the indiscretion if he had a change of heart. It seems there’s nothing past 2015, and I feel like he must have changed his opinion if he was silent about it during COVID.

Maybe it’s just wishful thinking, I haven’t looked past the wiki.

So now we get bombarded with articles telling us who to point the finger at, and they are all conveniently either retiring or their seat isn’t up for grabs.

Hmmmmmm

Everyone that doesn’t think like me is gaslighting me :(

No one has yet to explain to me how a choice of software is a valid filter. All I get are emotional “well I don’t like it”, as if their friends have never done or used something they don’t approve of. People are really fiending for an echo chamber it seems, even in their own personal lives and not just online.

It’s simply shallow, like if I said I’m not friends with apple users. I hate the company and am justified in that hate, but making or breaking friendships over it is childlike behavior.

I doubt there’s much proof outside your own bias.

I think you may be concentrating on a very small percentage of users, and using that false impression and your own bias to pass broad faulty judgements.

I use AI but I’ve never even thought of doing the behavior you speak of.

If you type in En force, you get the correct answer. If you type in En-force, it assumes you made an error and wanted to type enforce and not en force.

It has no context to go on, but it is silly that the normal google algo understands but Gemini doesn’t. I’m fairly certain it’s because the summary uses different links then what is actually given by the regular search algo (I think it rewrites your query as well).

I don’t like the summary above google, I’m not defending it but just explaining where the error stems from and what the user meant.

Edit: it’s a bot lol, yes the period makes no sense. I glossed over his reply and thought he was making the same point as a comment below.

No, it has nothing to do with “if I like it” but the substance of the response. If the person said the opposite (dropped friends that didn’t like AI), I would have the same reaction.

If their fiance tells them they use chatgpt and their first response is to call off the wedding, it’s clear there is little actual logic going on, which leaves emotion. It’s also incredibly shallow.

This is “picking friends because of their favorite sport team” energy.

It was hypothetical and the response to that hypothetical question was emotional.

The children example was clearly talking about other articles.

Yes, people are allowed to break up for whatever reason, but this specific reason is incredibly shallow.

I do have friends that don’t like AI and I wouldn’t dream of dropping them because of it. It’s insane, it’s just a difference in opinion. I want meaningful relationships, not an echo chamber.