Not my OC

  • quediuspayu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 months ago

    In my time we started most shows in the middle of whatever season was on when you stumbled them while flipping channels.

    • Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      But also shows were made for syndication, so most didn’t have overarching plotlines and it didn’t matter what order you watched them in. There might be one (heavily advertised) event a season that actually affected anything, and it’d be something like two characters getting married rather than something that fundamentally shook up the concept.

    • Damage@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      Nah, start from the beginning. When I introduced my partner to star trek, she loved the first TNG seasons, despite recognizing that the latter are better

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        The first episode also introduces every character.

        It would be a miss for new watchers to skip it, even if some of you don’t like the episode.

        The dish separation was what made me understand there was a lot more to Star Trek then I first thought and made me continue watching, even if it didn’t happen again.

    • Luke@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      A few of my very favorite episodes of Star Trek ever are in season 1, though. I wouldn’t skip it entirely!

      • s01e11 Haven, because I love Lwaxana when she’s being mischievous
      • s01e13 Datalore, for Spiner in his early glory
      • s01e18 Home Soil, for a decent “murder mystery”
      • s01e22 Symbiosis, seriously one of the best episodes of the whole show with a lesson on why the Prime Directive is important, plenty of Crusher vs Picard moral discussions, and an attempt at a sympathetic view on drug addiction (though a dated one now)
    • LOGIC💣@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Even though I think DS9 is objectively better than TNG, I would still recommend TNG to get into it, as the more exploration focus should appeal to a wider audience.

    • lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Picard is easily the worst serious ever. And I don’t mean it in the sense of “place to start” but in the sense of “worst serious period”. Discovery is great tho.

      • rozodru@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        it’s an odd series for sure. I did enjoy the last season purely for the Enterprise-D returning. But still it’s weird how they kinda just tossed Wes aside as if he didn’t exist because THIS Crusher son was “WAY more important”. It’s like hey Beverly, you have another kid. one who at this point is WAY more powerful than your hybrid Borg thingy Son.

      • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        As a non-Trekkie, I found it enjoyable enough… ditto with Discovery (at least the first season).

        I just picked those two because they were literally my introduction to Star Trek TV series, and I know both are quite divisive in the community…

        • lugal@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Funny, I liked the later seasons of Discovery much more when it grew its beard grew its dreadlocks.

          Picard has it’s moments but a ton of fan service that wouldn’t work for non-Trekkie’s I would assume but maybe that’s why you didn’t care about it and wasn’t bothered. It’s “let’s take the heroes of these series and let them fight against these villains from these series and the storyline from there”. Maybe it works even better if you’re new to all of them.

          I wouldn’t even say it’s bad but all the other series are better, so have fun discovering the other series 😉

  • pedz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    Lost, confused, disturbed, unsettled, baffled and eve a bit turned on.

    This could describe every decon scene in ENT.

    • FoxyFerengi@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      I loved when they got tired of putting the eye candy in those scenes and started throwing in random characters like Porthos.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      If you insist on watching TNG from the beginning, be warned the first two seasons are a bit rough and there’s that one “Then we went to the black people planet and got blacked at” episode which even the cast of the show hates that episode.

  • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    I have never watched a single star trek thing and the only knowledge I have about it comes from you guy’s memes

    • But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      I never was into it, always a Star Wars kid. My gf dad had episodes of TAS going one day and I got sucked into it to my surprise, i didnt think I’d appreciate a show that I always saw as old and kinda cheesy. I watched a few more episodes and really liked it. He did me a big favour, told me even if I wasn’t going to watch it all at once, he said watch space seed the episode, then go watch the first two movies. What an epic, you get a great introduction to Star Trek and one of its greatest villains Khan.

      After that I tired TNG but didnt like it, don’t like most Star Trek, I always go back to the original. I did watch discovery with my wife and it was ok, but strange new worlds is my second favourite now.

  • glorkon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    The Star Trek universe is based on the premise that a peaceful, united mankind is acting as a benevolent, civilized partner and friend of all alien species.

    But let’s be honest, we all know we would behave like the aliens from Independence Day - mercilessly conquering and harvesting alien worlds and spreading destruction across the universe.

    • @glorkon @USSBurritoTruck

      Star Trek also assumes a truly post-scarcity society in which capitalism plays, at most, a small part.

      One of the problems we face in assessing human potential is that we pretty much only know of humans since the Neolithic, when authority and wealth became increasingly centralized. In the Star Trek universe, while authority remains hierarchical and highly centralized, economic inequality is somewhat diminished. These are different sets of social premises and the outcomes might vary.

      • glorkon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Indeed, outcomes may vary. I remember growing up in West Berlin in the 1980s, surrounded by the GDR - a highly centralized and hierarchical society with diminished economic inequality. We frequently got time off school because the smog was so bad.

        I’m very skeptical if a human society is possible which does not lead to over-exploitation of resources and recklessness towards discovered species on alien planets. I also doubt that the technology required for space travel could be developed in a sustainable manner in the first place.

        I wouldn’t rule out the possibility of a Star Trek type society which was somehow able find a solution for this problem, but I fear it’s highly unlikely. Ultimately, we’re selfish apes. That’s why I find the Star Trek premise unrealistic.

    • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      But let’s be honest, we all know we would behave like the aliens from Independence Day - mercilessly conquering and harvesting alien worlds and spreading destruction across the universe.

      This would be true, except that Star Trek assumes a truly post-scarcity world where nobody needs to harvest alien worlds. Hell, the capitalists (Ferengi) are depicted as ruthless and conniving (oftentimes outright cartoonish) villains most of the time.

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        the capitalists (Ferengi) are depicted as ruthless and conniving (oftentimes outright cartoonish) villains

        And once again, reality lets out a “here we go again” sigh and says “fine… hold my beer.”

  • nullpotential@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Start with TOS and if you find it too hard to watch start with TNG and if you find the first bit of TNG too hard to watch you can skip ahead of you really want to I guess, but I find it all worth watching.

  • MalikMuaddibSoong@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Wow, Devils Due is like the second episode I watched (first was Silicon Avatar) and I remember enjoying the ending where Picard mimics all her tricks before telling her to fuck off.

    In hindsight easily a notgreat episode, but I remember it fondly.