A homeowner in Goodyear, Arizona is locked in a dispute with his homeowner’s association over his practice of distributing free cold water from his driveway.

  • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    108
    ·
    6 days ago

    I found an update about the vote to remove the three board members.

    Homeowners voted 190 to 20 in favour of removal, however the board cancelled the vote claiming there wasn’t a 24 hour notice given to the community and subsequently that 210 votes might not qualify a quorum of more than a thousand homes.

    • MNByChoice@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      60
      ·
      6 days ago

      Oh, that will go well. Piss off people and make their vote not count. The people that know where you live and can see your front door…

      • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        To play devil’s advocate for a moment, having a sufficient vote notification period is important.

        Though if that were the board’s true concern, they surely would have announced intention to notify the community alongside their statement cancelling the vote for this reason, which hasn’t happened insofar as I can tell.

        Voting details:

        According to recent census data, Goodyear has 2.7 people per household. It doesn’t say for the city specifically, but Arizona appears to have a minor population of 21%. I saw in the statement this association represents “over 1,000” households. In my experience, that could mean anywhere from 1,001 - 1,099 homes. The city of Goodyear held a vote earlier this year to approve a water utility contract, which lists an expected voter turnout of 17%.

        By this, I’m guessing less than 3,000 people live in this community, with about 2,400 eligible to vote on an association proposal, but likely around 400 people that would go to the effort of voting on such a tedious issue.

        I think that if half of the community shows up with less than a day’s notice to make themselves heard, that’s probably representative enough for how the community feels about these board members.

        • MNByChoice@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 days ago

          I appreciate your comment.

          I dislike administrative issues on votes being called out by the board after the vote takes place. When administrative issues are noted after the vote, it looks like the board is trying to subvert the membership.

          • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 days ago

            Thank you. I did think about that also.

            ‘Volunteers’ did the counting, but surely they should have known or been informed that a quorum of votes equal to x% of the community are required for the vote to be valid. If the count doesn’t meet or exceed that value, discard the ballots.

            Or even why was the vote permitted to take place in less than the required notification period? I presume the answer to these questions is either incompetence or bravado on the part of the board members taking their position for granted.

            I find it unlikely that if the vote had went the other way, the board would have had the integrity to raise the same objections.

    • j0ester@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      6 days ago

      Donald stated you’ll never have to vote again… retards cheered. This is how it will start.

    • ramble81@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      Luckily both of those are easy to remediate. The bylaws state what is a quorum and you can give more notice. This won’t stop things.

    • nthavoc@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 days ago

      Well that sucks. I don’t know what their rules are, but having dealt with shitty HOA’s, if all the rules of the agreement were followed and you get their attorneys involved, their attorneys in most cases will tell those dickheads knock it off if the agreement was followed. This sounds like a violation on the HOA’s part of the agreement but again, I don’t know how it’s written. I do know if an update was pushed every single resident shall have received the update for it be valid and they shall have a copy of the agreement ready upon request. I hate shitty HOA’s. Good luck to them.

  • joostjakob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    How anyone that lives in a country that has HOAs can unironically call it “land of the free” is beyond me

    • Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Some HOAs can be quite nice as they’re just there to add some basic community rules. However, many are hijacked by a handful of narcissistic individuals who let this insignificant amount of power go to their heads and they turn into a bunch Mussolinis

      • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Having served on the board of my building, you see what slobs and mindless people you share the planet with. Letting their pets piss in the hallway. It gets cleaned by staff, right? What’s the problem? Compost stinks, leave the bin in the hallway! Doesn’t matter as long as I don’t smell it, right?

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 days ago

      “ProPTeRy VaLUes!”

      No one sees any value in just living in their homes. They have to be statements on your personal wealth, and though that, statements on your character as a human being. Living under the thumb of narcissists is a small price to pay so your neighbor doesn’t look poor.

      • Fluke@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        It’s not a home, not even usually a statement of wealth. The “statement” properties are invisible behind large gates and long driveways.

        In most cases, they’re investments, rather than homes. A way to gain wealth, not brag about it.

        • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          They are definitely statements of wealth. Just because it’s investment doesn’t mean it’s also a statement of wealth. Try growing vegetables in your front lawn or hanging cloths to dry. These are things poor people do.

    • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      What do you think a city or state is? Gotta have rules, good luck living in a neighborhood without a HOA when the fat shirtless guy next door turns his front lawn into an open air trash heap.

      • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        6 days ago

        My city has bylaws for that sort of thing. I can’t let my grass turn into a jungle either. That’s also a bylaw. Shoveling snow into the street? Guess what, bylaw.

        Don’t need an HOA full of overbearing Karen’s to Lord over me about what color I painted my garage on top of the fairly loose bylaws that I also need to abide by.

        At least with bylaws they’re enforced by public workers, not Karen from next door.

        • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          6 days ago

          You guys are wrong. The city handles what overflows onto ITS property, they don’t care about your property. That’s what the HOA is for.

          You can’t leave your trash on the sidewalk (city property) randomly, the city can’t do jack shit if some slob leaves his trash on his lawn.

          Until rats set in. You guys comfortable leaving things degenerate to that level until the city acts?

          • Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            6 days ago

            This is straight up not true in many places. Where I live they have a long list of things you can’t have in your yard, or in your yard for extended periods of time. They have a list of rules for the flora, maintenance, etc.

            The only time your assumption is true is the inside of the house. They can’t do much there until it is a fire hazard, bio hazard, etc. , but that level of hoarding stuff is not common, and even then, there are limits to it before the city intervenes

          • socsa@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            6 days ago

            You are the one who is clueless. My city absolutely will fine people for violating the upkeep laws. I know because I’ve been fined for grass before, and I know one of my neighbors had an abandoned, rotting car towed out of their driveway.

            • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              6 days ago

              That’s my point. They’ll do something when it’s three feet tall, but maybe I want the neighbor to cut it before it reaches that level?

              • Null User Object@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                6 days ago

                That’s my point.

                No, that wasn’t your point. Now you’re moving the goal post. Your point was, and I quote,

                The city handles what overflows onto ITS property, they don’t care about your property.

                Plus, the article explicitly states that the ordinance specifies 12 inches, not three feet.

                You can keep digging your hole deeper, but it’s not going to support your claim. Your just wrong here, and one sign of a well adjusted adult is knowing when to admit they’re wrong.

                • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  11
                  ·
                  6 days ago

                  They don’t care about your property, right. No one wants 12 inch grass.

                  It is you who is wrong. The HOAs exist to make people respect human living conditions, not the contractor-grade specs the city enforces for its purposes.

                  Try to picture a city with just the city rules enforced. All right, it’s 1 foot tall grass, not three feet. OK, it’s three trash bags with rats, not 12.

                  That enough? Of course it isn’t.

                  The grass matters to the city when it overflows onto its property. One hopes that in the vast majority of cases, people will maintain their property a bit better on their own. The HOA just makes it possible to ensure that. The vast majority of HOAs aren’t PITAs, only the extreme stories make it to the news.

                  If you like your lawn 1 foot tall with trash bags everywhere, move to where there is no HOA. I realize there are fewer and fewer trailer parks these days, but that’s not my fault.

                  I don’t know how to put it simpler.

                  " Your just wrong here, and one sign of a well adjusted adult is knowing when to admit they’re wrong."

                  It’s “you’re”, and I’m not, and take your own advice.

          • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            They can where I live. While I might “own” the land, I’m in Canada and there’s a very specific and technical legal definition, I never “own” anything. The land is owned by the crown, and we lowly peons get to “buy” (or lease in perpetuity for a one time set cost, plus property taxes every year) the land we live on.

            The Crown, and by extension, the government acting on behalf of the crown, can do whatever the fuck they want, including telling you what you can, and cannot do with your land, and whether you can turn it into a trash heap.

            Many other places are the same, though, not as technically/legally screwed; I don’t have to look any further than city zoning to know that similar (in effect, not implementation) rules exist for everyone. Zoning means you can’t just turn your plot of land into an industrial manufacturing operation because you feel like it. That’s the government telling you what you can (or cannot) do with your property. There’s plenty more examples and rules that limit people’s freedoms as to what they can do with “their” property, if you do any research at all.

            Don’t be such a spoon.

      • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        Plenty of places don’t have HOAs, like my neighborhood. We just bitch at each other. If things got really bad you could just call the city.

      • Deathray5@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        As a European with HOA’s I would like to ask how you if you’ve seen how people handle things outside of “freedom land”

  • nthavoc@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    101
    ·
    7 days ago

    The good news is he read the HOA agreement, initiated a special meeting through signatures, and now the neighborhood is holding a special election to remove the dickhead board members.

    • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Reading letters and things from hundreds of years ago when they hanged and gibbeted pirates on the streets of towns tells me I’d rather them be hanged far away from town so they don’t stink up the place.

      • Deflated0ne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Isn’t it though? Was slavery ended by debate? Did Lincoln send a strongly worded letter to the president of the CSA that tore at his heart strings and made him see the humanity in his slaves? How about the Gilded Age? The unions sat the bosses down and laid out the facts and the oligarchs of the day just let us have the 8hr day, 40hr week, weekends, pensions. All out of the goodness of their hearts.

        Some people just need killing. That’s all there is to it. I’m American. I know how we’re propagandized from the age of comprehension into believing that violence is never the answer. But that’s all it was. Propaganda. It took murder to make United Healthcare provide the service they exist to provide. And it didn’t last 6 months. At that point more murder was necessary but nobody stepped forward.

    • Jimbabwe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      So if I get married and move into a new house and we now have two incomes, so we decide to rent the old house instead of selling it… the answer is death by hanging? For both of us? Kids too? My parents helped me buy the first house… they culpable as well?

          • Deflated0ne@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            You wanna talk about reasonable.

            Nowhere in the continental US can a person afford rent on minimum wage working a full time job. Not one state.

            And it’s the fault of landlords jacking up prices because they could get away with it. Not just them. But the problem existed before Covid. Before Private Equity got the idea to buy everything.

            • Jimbabwe@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Nowhere in the continental US can a person afford rent on minimum wage working a full time job

              This is wrong. You’re talking about the fact that a single person living alone on average cannot afford average rents in any state, but rents can be found at below average prices, and more importantly, many 2-3 room options are affordable when 2-3 minimum wage workers live together and combine their incomes. Living alone is a luxury and frankly, a quite wasteful one. There are more than twice as many people than houses in the USA source so to have everyone living alone would require considerable ruinous environmental destruction and expansion. Maybe YOU should be hanged for suggesting it! (I’m kidding of course)

              And it’s the fault of landlords jacking up prices because they could get away with it.

              Proof? Evidence? You’re going to need to be pretty damn convincing if you want me to join your rally to hang everyone involved.

  • Zephorah@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    6 days ago

    If you’re in a state with ballot measures, then you could campaign for rules against single family home HOAs.

  • Griffus@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    What a dystopian hell hole. My condolences to everyone having something like HOA in their lives. May you all experience a civilised and free country at some point.

    • Lka1988@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      7 days ago

      The HOA I live in doesn’t allow motorcycles in the driveway. Garage only.

      I have two. They take up more room than you’d expect.

    • orbitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 days ago

      I see many homeless people in my area, I am more withdrawn but I always think of grabbing a case of water for our hot times to hand out, even if it may not be cool. Sort of too shy to follow through previously but it gets like 30-40C this part of Canada in the summer and we sort of need water to live.

  • 6stringringer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 days ago

    He thought HOA meant hand outs available. It’s blazing hot af, who would care for some cold water? Yeah, what a turd this guy is. Goddamn hoa needs to stroke out & get a new board.

  • ReverendIrreverence@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    Without reading the article and having dealt with an HOA in the past I will guess he was causing more traffic in the area

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s not paywalled. You could actually read it. As a spoiler alert, your guess appears to be wrong. They don’t mention that as the issue.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        It’s not paywalled.

        It is however impossible to reject all the cookies. So I’m going to give it a wide berth

    • PattyMcB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 days ago

      Depending on the covenants, they could most likely put a lien on his home, and even take his home from him (eventually)

      Fuck HOAs

    • iglou@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 days ago

      That’s the fucked up thing about HOAs. Their rules are legally enforceable, as long as the rules themselves are legal to impose. Just like any other contract. It’s a fucked up system.

  • RattlerSix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    6 days ago

    What is the point giving free water to neighbor kids or people walking their dogs? They, by definition, have homes within walking distance with their own unlimited water supply.

      • RattlerSix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I suppose I don’t see it as a nice thing to do if it’s completely pointless. Not that I’m against it, I’m just a little confused by it.

        • Mesophar@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          It’s not pointless, they could walk back home, sure, but if they are going for a longer walk and are a couple of blocks away from home, that’s a couple of blocks closer they get water. Or if they are active and playing outside, giving them water would likely be much appreciated.

          Water in disposable plastic bottles is wasteful, sure, and maybe you’d have a point saying it would be better to offer cups of water. Maybe there are other people, further away, that could use the water more, sure. But providing something to someone in an act of generosity and good will is nice.

      • RattlerSix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Honestly, I don’t think so. Unless I’m going somewhere where water will be unavailable for several hours, but then I’ll just stop and get some.

    • BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Lol you sheltered as hell, most of these hoas exist outside of cities in suburbs, where people like you live watching fox news, getting paranoid and angry over imaginary threats

      • KMAMURI@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        I’m not American and I don’t live in the burbs. American exceptionalism is everywhere. Enjoy your dictators. HOA’s, condo boards and Drumpfkins too.

        • BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Doesn’t matter where you live, you are still a naive kid if you think cities are full of boogeyman, any place with a high population density will have lifestyles that are gonna be different from more rural places, some might like it some don’t, doesn’t mean either side is wrong, just different

          • KMAMURI@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            Cities make people crazy.

            I didn’t once say cites are full of boogeymen. I’ve not even suggested I was scared of the city. I mentioned nothing about different lifestyles either. In fact I didn’t even tell you whether I lived in a city or not and you know nothing about my own lifestyle. It’s not childish. It’s reality. Here we are with a bunch of people drawing assumptions about me simply because I made a statement they don’t agree with. That’s what is childish.

    • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Doesn’t really have anything to do with location. There are nutters and busy bodies everywhere. Most of the non city people voted for the president and representatives that are destroying the usa.

    • DominatorX1@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      That is the truth. The bigger, the denser, the crazier. It’s some kind of emergent feedback effect. Like a mass of uranium.

      Of course the city dwellers will protest that assertion.

  • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    259
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Ugh this isn’t what HOAs are for!

    HOAs are intended to harass and discriminate against black and brown people so that they don’t move in, or at least immediately leave.

    Not white guys with majestic beards.

    He must’ve been giving water to black or brown people, it’s the only justifiable reason.

    • Today@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      88
      ·
      7 days ago

      HOA’s are for people who used to be in positions of perceived power at work but now they’re retired and they miss bossing/bitching at people.

        • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 days ago

          Maybe HOA members need to be introduced to kink. There’s a safe way to dom, folks!

          I wouldn’t be surprised if prudish repression underlies a lot of their decisions too. Oh, the world we could live in if uptight people could simply indulge in powerplay kink now and then.

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 days ago

      HOAs are intended to harass and discriminate against black and brown people so that they don’t move in

      Lol I was going to make a joke here about “Redline Homes Inc.” - but it turns out there really is such a company, in Oklahoma of course.