Madonna ‘Donna’ Kashanian, 64, was taken by plainclothes officers from her home in New Orleans

A 64-year-old Iranian woman, who has lived in the US for 47 years, was detained by immigration agents on Sunday morning while gardening outside her home in New Orleans.

According to a witness, plainclothes officers in unmarked vehicles handcuffed Madonna “Donna” Kashanian and transported her to a Mississippi jail before transferring her to the South Louisiana Ice processing center in Basile, reports Nola.

Kashanian arrived in the US in 1978 on a student visa and later applied for asylum, citing fears of persecution due to her father’s ties to the US-backed Shah of Iran. Her asylum request was ultimately denied, but she was granted a stay of removal on the condition she comply with immigration requirements, a condition her family says she always met.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      4 hours ago

      She left Iran as a child fleeing the persecution of the regime that enriches uranium for a nuclear weapons program.

      It’s a complete travesty these ICE thugs may deport this woman to that same regime because they’re trying to meet a fucking quota.

      But sure, good joke bro. The Ayatollah is the good guy because US is the bad guy. Ever consider they might both be bad guys and this woman is going to suffer because of it?

      • Megamanexent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I think the previous comment may have added a /s if it was not the fact that, in reality, it may be the American Regime excuse.

        • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          4 hours ago

          What’s the Ayatollah regime’s excuse for beating women to death for showing their hair? That regime may not be the good guys…

            • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Sorry, I didn’t realize this story about an innocent women potentially being deported to a country that beats women to death was intended to be a feel good jokey kind of thread. My mistake, I guess.

              • 13igTyme@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                3 hours ago

                No one said it was a “feel good” story. The other person is using sarcasm to cope. Something very common and also shown in other comments of this story.

                If you don’t like it, don’t respond. No one is forcing you to provide an opinion on everything. Be less of a dick.

    • Allonzee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Trumpers only see Trumpers as “good people.” if they could press a button and watch everyone around them who isn’t one die in agony for the schaudenfreude of it, they would.

      That’s why they’re trying to turn empathy into a character deficit and slur.

      This is what separates them from everyone else. I’m an extreme leftist, something some low information Americans incorrectly paint as just as extreme as the MAGA cult, when I want that MAGA cult to have access to Healthcare based on need, higher Ed based solely on merit, conditionless housing and social supports, while they want me dead, and preferably painfully.

      I pity them because they were made by for profit media propaganda meant to divide and profit.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        12 hours ago

        to have access to Healthcare based on need, higher Ed based solely on merit,

        Who will evaluate need and merit?

        “Meritocracy” is the one word communists here in Russia use that I’ve learned to absolutely hate, they mean by that a hierarchical system where it’s administratively decided who behaved well and who didn’t.

        See, that’s the problem with leftists, always trying to use contrasts to make their virtue signaling look better.

        Most leftists are like “we haven’t yet invented a system, but we will compare an imagined one fulfilling all our desires to the worst real world ones”. And those who are inventing systems, are the least popular - cause such a thought experiment system will already be worse than one fulfilling all desires. Not talking sweet enough.

        • Allonzee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Who will evaluate need and merit?

          Doctors and academic performance records aka grades weighed by academics, not bloodsucking capitalist leeches.

          • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Any metric used as a KPI stops being useful as a metric, have you heard that?

            The very moment academics and such are going to decide on real power, you’ll have the right academics emerge, of “scientific communism professors” kind.

        • RedAggroBest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Why is it even a question? Would you rather live in a plague of nepobabies? Meritocracy isn’t some stretched definition or vague notion being chased.

          • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            It is both. No human can be entrusted evaluating merit for the “meritocracy” word to form, that is, to defined a hierarchy.

      • Darleys_Brew@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        The really stupid thing is, this woman might have been pro-Trump, there are other minorities that are. Trump people are so short sighted.

    • ultranaut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 day ago

      They don’t actually care about pissing money away. They enjoy good people getting tortured because they hate them and do not see them as people.

      • cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        They do see them as people, but specifically bad people. A non-person would be beneath their notice. A bad person on the other hand, becomes the target of their wrath and cruelty and it is justified to do this to them because they are bad.

    • TuffNutzes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The Trumper cult will hate and kill at any cost. That’s their main MO, hatred and to inflict pain. They are 100% objectively bad people.

      In a lot of situations there are just good people in bad situations, but no, these are, by any measure, simply bad (sub)humans. They are irredeemable sociopaths and a net negative on society.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t understand why they denied her asylum. The case seems really straightforward.

    • Carmakazi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Likely because her reasoning and fears were at odds with our geopolitics. It’d be like us accepting South Korean refugees for their fear of North Korean reprisal…if North Korea had largely been subsumed and the war was over for several years.

      • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Your analogy makes no sense. This woman came here in 1978 and the Shah was booted in 1979. It is entirely believable that she would have faced reprisals in Iran during the massacres of 1981.

        I don’t know why this woman was denied asylum but her request was well justified by events.

        • Carmakazi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          23 hours ago

          She first came in as a student in 78 but applied for asylum later. And that kind of thing can take a long time to process, years even.

          To put it more directly, accepting her request would be a tacit admission that US foreign policy made Iran a more dangerous place, not by accident, but as a side effect of its success.

      • someguy3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        She arrived before the Iranian revolution. Going back after the revolution with a Western education means at the very least she would have been deemed very very very suspicious. And why would a new paranoid religious government take the risk at all? Easier to purge.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    22 hours ago

    No, you see, she’s trafficking fentanyl. She’s one of the awful criminals he promised to lock up. /s

  • Paddzr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    What are these immigration requirements? Surely if she breached them, it would be an easy thing to point out?