• yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    A coworker once told me that the South was doomed because the North had a larger industrial base. I said that sounded like wisdom in English, but it was a joke in Vietnamese.

    • Ioughttamow@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I suppose when that industrial output needs to cross an ocean. Not so much when it just needs to cross a river.

    • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Apples and oranges.

      Vietnamese had been fighting for twenty years against the French and Japanese. The South thought they would achieve victory with a few battles.

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Not to mentioned the U.S. deployed something like 2.7 million people to Vietnam over the years. ~58,000 U.S. soilders died. Somewhere between 1-3 million people died in the war. Everyone lost that war. With deaths between 95%-98% not being U.S. troops though… It’s hard to argue when someone says the U.S. didn’t lose. We should have never been there, it was horrible… but any proud boy I meet in a bar who knows the numbers is going to call that a win… Because they don’t care about anything other than how many “bad people” died, and they consider anyone who looks/talks/acts different, bad people.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      The south was doomed because a significant portion of their labor hated them. They also had terrible industrial capacity, no international legitimacy, and no asymmetric advantage.

      It’s a lot more like when Cambodia invaded Vietnam than when America did.