• untakenusername@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 hours ago

    doesnt sound very free market to me

    if they raise prices because they have to, thats just normal

    if they raise prices because they can get away with it, thats kinda nasty though

    • IhaveCrabs111@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Captain dipshit said he’ll be watching and so will the customers. So? The price will go up from the tariffs. It’s like he struggles to be this much of a moron. I feel like he’s so stupid that I get dumber every time I have to listen to him talk.

  • Jackcooper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    WalMarts whole thing is tiny profit margins

    They literally don’t have a choice. It isn’t about giving up profit margins, it’s about having a profit margin AT ALL.

    • Azal@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Walmarts whole thing is driving out competition. They’re the richest company in the world and supported Trump. They asked for this.

  • Azal@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Hahaha! This is the ONE time I agree with Trump.

    All defending the house that Sam built, it is the richest company in the world by revenue beating out Amzaon and state owned organizations like Saudi Aramco and Chinese controlled organizations. It regularly bullies its way into small towns, demanding tax cuts and the infrastructure to build their stores, run those stores at a loss until all competition is gone then raises prices to squeeze out the area. Then is happy to shut down the “bottom performing stores” leaving a wasteland behind for these towns that lost everything to the mega giant. They’re turning the home town of Bentonville into Austin, even driving out local business for their friends out of Austin.

    And the biggest thing is… Project 2025, all of this going on, written by the Heritage Foundation… The Walton Family Foundation is one of the big funders of the Heritage Foundation as well as many of the other Project 2025 advisory board partners. They made it easy to search even! https://www.waltonfamilyfoundation.org/grants-database

    I’ve come from its home town, Walmart has always pushed a radical republican conservative agenda. Walmart is not some hapless victim, this is pure 100% leopards dining on some faces that voted for the leopards eating faces party.

    • Furbag@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The only thing I agree with on Trump here is that he’s correctly pointing out that WalMart made billions in profits last year. Yes, WalMart supported this monster in the first place thinking it would work out for them in the long run, so it’s a leopards eating faces scenario for sure, and I wouldn’t be sad if WalMart lost profits this year because of Trump’s stupidity. It’s just too bad that regular people are going to suffer because WalMart killed the small businesses that used to support towns that they wormed their way into.

      We aren’t even done adjusting to inflation pricing, and here we are not getting slapped with a Trump Tax on top of it. Madness.

  • Sunsofold@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    8 hours ago

    It’s depressing how important this is. Walmart is core to a lot of American’s purchasing. If Walmart decides to kiss the ring, even for a while, when they stop could determine when a wave of anger will hit, maybe even control the midterms. If they just pass on the prices now, many americans’ cost of living is going to soar, right at the same time many of them will be facing layoffs as businesses choke to death on materials costs.

    Anyone else remember what happened last time large numbers of americans experienced large amounts of free time? Do you think they’ll be any happier when they are experiencing that level of free time without the benefit of CoViD stimulus? A lot of people are going to get hurt.

    • PhAzE@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Their costs go up because of the tariffs, he can’t expect them to lose profit at scale just to appease him. It would be a super bad business decision on Walmarts side if they do that.

      • LogicalFallacy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        They literally can’t without getting sued by investors. Look at United Healthcare - they’re getting sued for lost profits because they couldn’t deny more claims after Luigi.

      • Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I’ll be shocked if Walmart choses to “eat the cost” for tariffs.

        They don’t “eat the cost” so their employees don’t need food stamps, a program also on the chopping block. If they gut medicate/medicaid the Walmart pharmacy will also definitely feel that loss.

  • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Perfect malicious compliance opportunity: the price tag stays the same, but add an itemized Trump Tax for the difference.

    • Azal@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Walmart won’t kiss the ring. They supported Trump. The only thing they’ll do is fight him if it looks like they can’t control him.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    23 minutes ago

    Just more displaying that the rich, and particularly rich people like trump, live in the land of no consequences. They make demands that others pay for, never themselves, and when underlings defy them they become furious. Walmart CEOs are underlings, now.

    • BadlyTimedLuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I hope this more of a “don’t bite the hand that feeds you,” and Trump recieves SOME kind of consequence. He’s been a conman for years, and at some point, CEOs should be able to see that. Like, do they really think he has THEIR best interests in mind? We’re lucky he’s even accepting that one plane as a bribe, since I expected him to sell out for the price of a big mac with fries (no drink).

  • Volume@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 hours ago

    And once the trade war is done, the prices will remain higher due to “record profits” and “people will continue to pay it because they have to”.

    • Azal@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      100% This. Walmart is far from the “aw shucks” helping the common man image it wants to portray

    • NotJohnSmith@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Certainly what we appear to have experienced in the UK, I’m sure it’s the same in other countries

      • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Britain’s a bit different, as it’s caught in a perfect storm. It got a large amount of its energy from Russia, and the invasion hit just as Britain was also pouring massive investment into renewables and nuclear, which has to be paid for via energy bills. Add onto that the £40bn annual loss to the economy from Brexit and yeah, prices aren’t going down any time soon, but it isn’t necessarily because of profiteering. For example, rail freight operators have mothballed their electric fleet because the tariff per mile is so much higher than diesel at the moment. And they’re a business sector who can readily change from electricity.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The American Lukashenko supporters are clueless about tariffs. Oh the fuck well, let them pay more for products in every single red run welfare Oblast in the USA. Like many have typed, those prices are not going to decrease.

  • YangChow@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Why not refund the taxpayers cost of tariffs from the tariffs collected? Tariffs are being broken out on invoices, file the tariff tax as deductions on 1040’s. It would be a wash for the taxpayers.

    • pacology@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The goal seems to be replacing of federal income tax with import tariffs (like it was in the 1800s). The flat rate they set could collect as much as the income tax if import levels stay the same. Also, some of the stats shared by the administration early on on collections per day would multiply up to the total income tax collected. Writing them off would be counterproductive.

      The only downside with consumption taxes is that they are regressive. People in the lowest income levels will end up paying more percentage richer people because there is so much that rich people can consume from overseas vs poorer people.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      That seems convoluted but also as stated it wouldn’t be a wash.

      A deduction means pretend that portion of income never existed and the taxable portion of it is not charged.

      Then generally the deduction has to be above the standard deduction to make sense to use, and the standard deduction is just so high nowadays.

      So if you claimed a hypothetical deduction of 1,000, then you reduce your tax burden by only 200 or so, assuming you otherwise had like 20 some odd thousand in deductions to get you close to the standard deduction.

      The only way it would be a wash is if it were a refundable tax credit with no qualifications, and that almost never happens for anything. I could imagine a non refundable credit that would make it a wash for anyone with sufficient tax liability.

      However, this would make the tariffs an utterly pointless needless complication, needing a whole lot more accounting by sellers and consumers just to get to a similar and simpler position of not doing the tariffs in the first place.

    • TheBloodFarts@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Well you see the problem here is that you’re using your brain and well we just can’t be having that