• Bwaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I bet the receiver that had noise figure low enough to detect that signal consumed more than 3nW while doing it.

  • Yorick@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    115
    ·
    2 days ago

    The magic of a clear line of sight and vacuum for a good ~384’300km!

    So should we do low power communications by using the moon as reflector dish?

  • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s easy, you just need a big antenna, low noise receiver (just cool it) for low bandwidth (keeps noise power low) and no interferers in the same frequency band.

  • NeatoBuilds@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    I use about 800mW for my fpv drone and if you get a little bit away from yourself and go behind a tree or something you could lose video pretty easily

    • recklessengagement@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Wonder what the latency would be like trying to fly my 3.5" on the moon from earth

      Although I suppose the lack of atmosphere would be the bigger issue…

      • Morphit @feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Think of the speeds you could fly at with no drag! I’m so bummed that the Grace Hopper drone didn’t get to fly after Intuitive Machines fluffed their second landing. That would have been awesome outreach from NASA.

        We want drones on the moon!

    • moody@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      technically 100 mW

      Technically a maximum of 100 mW, but realistically much lower than that.