As a straight man, i concur.

One method is writing the text in black, copy-pasting it, then taking copy down a font size and change its color. I am also pretty sure there’s a button click to add an outline.

https://www.complex.com/pop-culture/a/markelibert/what-did-tiffany-gomas-viral-not-real-plane-woman-see

Ah, right, from earlier

Not great for her, I imagine, considering this was a tantrum now immortalized on the internet. She’s tried to ride the coverage like hawk tuah girl did, but with much less success it seems. Probably just doomed to be recognised at random times, likely in a mixed-bag fashion.

I have yet to meet a woman I’m close enough friends with who doesn’t have a personal sexual assault story. Not a harrassment story, an SA story. Could just be bad luck but i don’t think it is. It also lines right up with the statistic that 3/4 women get sexually assaulted before 30 (that stat is from memory, but I’ll try and track it down in a bit.)

I believe It is much worse than you think.

EDIT: so on the stat I popped: NSVRC says 1 in 5 women in their lifetimes and RAINN says 1 in 6 in their lifetime. It’s been a while since i’d read that stat so it makes sense it’d be off.(though it is disappointing just how far off it ended up being, big whiff on my part) Those stat pages also have numbers for men as well

Have a fallback system that informs the user that there are no woman drivers and that it will be choosing a man driver because of that, most likely I think.

She didn’t end up being executed, though, it was commuted to life imprisonment. Still, much more than most countries have done.

2268 dead babies

Well, that’s because TERFs are posers that don’t know any of radical feminism’s actual theory.

It’s kind of like how anarchocapitalists call themselves ‘libertarians’. They are entirely just muddying the waters either out of sheer ignorance or active malice.

I think you need to read up more on what radical feminism is. It is more down the rabbit hole than you’re describing.

It’s not the flipping of society to place women in men’s roles. it’s the eventual elimination of man-woman destinction entirely. Their end goal is for genitals to eventually not matter culturally. They attack ‘The Patriarchy’ because it is the current cultural zeitgeist that must be dismantled to make way for this liberated non-binary society they envision.

They got organs n property /s

So, how likely is it that neanderthals and humans just lived in tribes together, and neanderthals just eventually died off within human tribes?

What is p-fracking, and how does it differ from regular fracking? Or is this post just asserting the definition?

Incel Phrenologists, in two words.

As a headsup, pedestrian deaths at crossings is consistently higher in places where right on red is legal. It’s not bad drivers, it’s a bad law enabling bad driving.

You can do the same thing without cops more cheaply in the long run. Just raising the crosswalks to sidewalk height completely changes driver behavior, as it’s both a speed bump, and it’s clearly communicated that the crosswalk is the pedestrians’ territory that the driver is crossing through.

We can deal with most of these issue through design rather than a threat of fines.

You should provide black outlines around the text to improve readability. You could also do what comic artists do professionally and instead change the font and style to differentiate the speakers.

It’s also the name of the lake at the center of the village in Illinois.

Makes sense why that would feel weird tho

Sounds like an analogy for drunk driving.

Regardless of whether it’s an illusion - if it is an illusion, it’s a compelling one, to the point that you can’t be perfectly confident in it being illusory.

You should, logically, at least try to carry out change by your own hands, because the alternative is to potentially squander whatever autonomy you may have.

It’d be like standing at an unlocked door, but being so convinced it’s locked, that you don’t even give a good try at turning the knob.