What was the bullet drop myth?

Young Adult novels I think.

The whole concept is more akin to whether or not you are working directly with the material fruits of your labor, or if you’re some secondary or tertiary job to the actual work being done.

Basically, their view is that if you are not directly making the product or apart of the physical logistics for that product, then you’re in a bullshit job. I would not say I agree with the philosophy myself, but i kind of get it. ‘I farm Corn’, ‘I Truck frozen food’, and ‘I catch fish’, do exist in a very different realm from ‘I manage a team of QA specialists’, ‘I am an Advertisement Consultant’, and ‘I contribute to my company’s server backend codebase’.

Also, yeah, the 3-word rule of thumb sucks.

Meritocracies are still terrible and not the thing to strive for.

Welp, cryptographic software Nintendo 64 port wasn’t on my bingo card, but I respect using retro-hardware emulation as the compatibility layer.

You’re carrying out a similar fallacy by claiming use of the term in its original field is illigitimate in this argument. On top of that, right on the wikipedia page for Eusociality, it states that biologists such as E.O. Wilson have previously argued that humans are weakly eusocial, weakening your whole argument in the first place.

The concept of humans as super-organisms is explored in both sociology and biology, and i’d argue that that means humans fit the bill. Whatever no-true-Scotsman version you’ve been gate keeping with doesn’t even fully agree with the field you’re supposedly arguing on the behalf of.

I see you’re point, I was a bit hasty when saying there’s no good reason to make an exception.

I still do not agree with the argument that ‘Ants are a superorganism, so it’s not really a genocide’. For humans it’s a genocide, because we’re trying to describe a social crime within humanity. For everything else, extermination is communicating the same thing, but generically.

The term was literally coined in an analysis of human social interaction by Herbert Spencer in his book “Principles of Sociology”. The term was created to describe humanity.

So are humans. We still call mass killings of humans a genocide. There’s no really good reason to make an exception for ants.

It is all four arms, both of MLK Jr’s and both of Corretta Scott King’s.

one side.

the other side.

It’s actually all four. I can see how one might confuse it for something obscene without the context.

If you ask me, I think we need to make obscene statues hip again. Bring back the priapus statues!

I don’t think this is meant as an anti-meme. It’s just a best friend fucking with his best friend. And his best friend’s wife.

Check between the couch cushions. That usually works for me.

“Yeah, he was lazy! So we 'The Cask or Amontillado’d him.”

Not supported by blender so far!

So something I’ve been confused by: are synapses transmitting via electrical signals, chemical signals , or both? It feels like whenever I read about broad brain function they talk about electrical signals, but whenever you research individual synapse function, they talk about chemicals being passed between one another.

I see. So the fard particles go across and up, while the shid particles are heavier and fall down. Very interesting, yes. I had assumed that the shid and fard would be homogenous, but they seperate rapidly from a cohesive solution.

That sounds like putting the cart before the horse. I would say that Frankenstein Abhors his creation, and does not name it because of it. I don’t think if he’d named it Greg or something, that he’d actually treat his monster any better.

Immediate murder suspect for any gruesome killings in the vicinity. Straight up looks like he misted someone with his feet.

I’d forgive if it were returned. It’s one of those ‘you’re my enemy until that plate gets put back in my microwave’ type-shit for me.

Return-the-slab-type shit.