fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 年前ugh i wishmander.xyzimagemessage-square329fedilinkarrow-up11.3Karrow-down119
arrow-up11.29Karrow-down1imageugh i wishmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 年前message-square329fedilink
minus-squareRekorse@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-21 年前Good news! As long as its given consentually then human milk is vegan! Gross edit: some body builders buy it to bulk up!
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 年前the vegan society definition makes no mention of consent.
minus-squareRekorse@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 年前That could be! Despite that, a big part of minimizing harm is consent!
minus-squareRekorse@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 年前I found something similar to our vegan debate! Polution! Its ever increasing year over year, but efforts to reduce pollution have reduced the rate of increase. Would you argue that since pollution increases year over year that we should abandon our current efforts as its clear they aren’t working?
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 年前we should do things that are effective at tackling our problems. your question is too broad to answer with any more specificity.
minus-squareRekorse@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 年前I dont need specifics because the proof is already there that whatever is being done now isnt working. Just like you argue that efforts to reduce animal consumption are proven futile by the increase in animal consumption year over year.
Good news! As long as its given consentually then human milk is vegan!
Gross edit: some body builders buy it to bulk up!
the vegan society definition makes no mention of consent.
That could be! Despite that, a big part of minimizing harm is consent!
not necessarily
Correct!
I always am
I found something similar to our vegan debate! Polution!
Its ever increasing year over year, but efforts to reduce pollution have reduced the rate of increase.
Would you argue that since pollution increases year over year that we should abandon our current efforts as its clear they aren’t working?
we should do things that are effective at tackling our problems. your question is too broad to answer with any more specificity.
I dont need specifics because the proof is already there that whatever is being done now isnt working. Just like you argue that efforts to reduce animal consumption are proven futile by the increase in animal consumption year over year.