• jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    16 hours ago

    One time in a DND game I had a dungeon with the property “you’ll never find what you’re looking for”. This has a bunch of fun effects. Among them when the players found a spiral stairway around a hole, they tried to find the bottom and, because of the rule, could not reach it. They tried to go back up, and couldn’t reach the previous floor either.

    So they decided, since they have feather fall, to just jump into the central hole and find the bottom that way.

    They fell for an uncomfortable long time. They passed the other party members who had split up (and couldn’t find them).

    Good times. Players heads were very fucked with.

    They did eventually figure it out.

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        9 hours ago

        One of the clues they found was from a survivor from the antagonist’s party who had gone in ahead of them. He said the boss-man had kept asking them lots of questions about their youth, where they’d grown up, their hobbies. Just a lot of personal questions. The survivor didn’t know why, since boss-man had never taken an interest in them before.

        spoiler for my old dnd game

        The trick is to walk without looking for anything in particular. If you just walk without a conscious goal, you’ll eventually find the room with the macguffin. The antagonist’s strategy was to keep them talking about stuff so they’re distracted, and not thinking about what they’re looking for.

        • TheOakTree@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          7 hours ago

          What if you kept descending the stairs in anticipation of… more stairs? Would the stairs cease to manifest? And would this lead to the macguffin?

  • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Now I’m wondering how long a person would have to be falling at parachute speeds to die and become skeletal.

        • ClockworkOtter@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Let’s say, for argument’s sake, that they are falling in “ideal conditions” and it takes the person 2 days to die (they had the shits when they jumped) and a further two days to dry out. With a parachute open they could be falling at about 10mph (or possibly even slower as they lose further moisture!). 4 days at 10mph is 960 miles

          The live person is the best person at skydiving to have ever lived, and spends most of the time not in the panels at 350mph (almost at the speed record). 960 miles at 350mph only takes 2.7 hours.

          Maybe not so long after all?

          My maths could be completely off though - haven’t used it much in years.

          • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            14 hours ago

            That body’s skeletized, which would take a lot longer than 2 days. Would being constantly falling slow down decomposition? Maybe.

        • my_hat_stinks@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          According to this article freefall speed is anywhere from 120mph to 200mph for a human depending on position, that’s roughly 190-320km/h. The radius of Earth is 6,371 km so you’d be traveling one Earth every 40-60 hours. In 80 years you’d cover between 133 and 224 million kilometers (82-139 million miles), traveling an entire Earth 28 to 47 million times. Interestingly this is still only roughly 10% the radius of the solar system, but it would get you to the moon and back 173 - 291 times. Space is big.

          With the parachute open obviously you’re a little slower, this article says 16-32 km/h. That’s close enough we can just divide the other estimates by 10, so you’d travel about 13-22 million km (8-14 million miles) or 1% the radius of the solar system.

          There’s a very good chance these numbers are a bit off, rough calculations that I didn’t bother to double-check.

    • elfpie@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      You can use the math below and correct the years to be close to 5. But we would end up with a mummy because of the conditions (wind leading to dessication).

    • ramble81@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      Assuming you don’t bring any food, the usual survival times: 3 days without water, 3 weeks without food. So a minimum 3 days… on the other hand, the time to turn into a skeleton would be much, much longer.

      Edit: Since I wanted to do some math, it looks like skydiving is about 120mph in free fall and then 20mph with the parachute open. Let’s say you got scared/bored of free falling after an hour and open your chute, that would be 71 hours before dying. So you would have traveled 1,540 miles (assuming earth gravity, wind resistance, etc). Someone who hasn’t pulled their cord would catch up to you after 12 hours, so very much within the “alive” window.

    • LOGIC💣@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I think it’s literally not possible to fall that long in one direction in an atmosphere. You could do it in space, though.

          • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            16 hours ago

            No, then it would have a bottom. For this pit to be truly bottomless (and considering someone died before hitting anything, it appears to be) it has to go on forever in a supernatural way.

            • LOGIC💣@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              15 hours ago

              I think you can also have a bottomless pit by simply having a large hole that goes all the way through a planet, directly through its center. But then you’d just go back and forth until wind resistance stops you.

              • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                14 hours ago

                I suppose you’re technically correct, as it has two tops, but no bottom. But the positioning of the corpse doesn’t make sense for a body that’s been going back and forth rather than just one direction the whole time.

    • Pika@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      18 hours ago

      its a 2 for 1 in the company world, pay 5$ to push someone who paid 5$ to get pushed. 😸

    • Saapas@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      It’s pretty surprising that AI wrote probably the best greentext ever

    • tetris11@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      In a normal deep but endful pit, you’d feel an increase in air pressure as you got deeper as you floated slower and slower. Eventually there will be enough bodies forming a buoyant layer (or, simply bodies lining the bottom of the pit) that you could carve climbing apparatus out of bones and climb back up, feasting on raw flesh as you ascend the wall of the pit. That, or the heat from the biomass of bodies would lift you and your parachute up a decent amount.

      In a bottomless pit, there is no increase in air pressure, the air just falls right through with no resistance because it hasn’t reached the end. You’d think that this creates a huge suction at the top of pit, sucking people into it, but no because the air just falls at the same rate that cold air leaves a room in a house, creating perhaps a slight draft into the pit. No bodies at the bottom, no layer of buoyant air, you’re just falling. Might as well control your ascent, with some careful parachuting, hook up with some hotties mid-fall, and then embrace the eternity of it

      • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        19 hours ago

        If there is an infinite column of air, the air entering or leaving the pit should be more or less constant, all else being equal outside the pit. But if there is a finite column of air falling into a vacuum, then there is an infinite vacuum, and I think the pit starts sucking air at the speed of sound.

        • LeninsOvaries@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Actually, there’s a finite amount of air in the pit, but it’s not falling. It’s already settled around the planet’s midpoint. The pit keeps going forever, but gravity starts pulling the other way after a while

          • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 hours ago

            A hole through a planet is not a bottomless pit. Like any normal hole, it is bounded on both ends. A bottomless pit has one bounded end and one unbounded end.

        • tetris11@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          18 hours ago

          I’m ignoring gravitational changes and changes in surrounding mass. AFAIK this is an infinite portal to hell that’s not even bound to this earthly plane.

          Otherwise I’ll have to assume an infinite mass towards the infinite end of the tunnel, which would create a compounding gravitational pull that would be infinite, and … *loses interest and watches paint dry*

      • MotoAsh@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        lol no. Air would absolutely flow into the pit at a rate relative to its pressure. It absolutely would not simply drift into a bottomless pit that would never see backpressure… That’s… just exceptionally stupid.

          • MotoAsh@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            16 hours ago

            No. That’s not how air works. At all. It’s the same as opening a portal to space. It’s not about infinities. It’s about how air fundamentally behaves.

  • Maestro@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    19 hours ago

    …why do you need a parachte in a bottomless pit? It’s not like you need it to land?

    • ButteryMonkey@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Have you ever stuck your head out a moving car window, into the high force wind, and found it very difficult to breathe? That’s what I imagine sky diving is like (not something I particularly want to try), and a ‘chute would slow that enough for comfortable breathing, I imagine.