Wars and proxy wars since 1776.

EDIT: The post is not an endorsement of the USSR. You can now stop fighting for your “team” and start defending the anti-war values you claim to uphold.

  • Rooskie91@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    If you think the USSR wasn’t, then you’re not actually smarter for thinking that, you’ve just fallen for another country’s propaganda.

    • Damionsipher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      The USSR was not communism. Even if you protest and hold ground that it was communist, it does not represent communism and was objectively separate from anarchism. You argument is akin to saying that the USA is democracy.

    • balderdash@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Republican-style whataboutism. Nice. I never defended the USSR and this still doesn’t change U.S. history.

      • Glide@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        1 day ago

        If you unironically look at this image and do not understand how it is perceived as in support of the USSR, then the school system is worse off than even I realized.

        Yes, you did not explicitly say it. But the natural inference is that these guys on the right, the USSR and the anarchists, are correct. To shamelessly sit there with your hands folded over like “well I’m only suggesting they’re right about this one specific thing, no one else should ever make any deeper inferences or assumptions, and it’s their fault if they do,” is either incredibly dishonest, or incredibly stupid.

  • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    Da, unlike peaceful soviet socialists who only use peaceful tanks to bring unity, whether or not other nations know they need to be unified. Or Anarchists who merely seek to gently dismantle society and bring harmony to the world by cleansing all threats to that harmony.

    The first half is fine, but the left side is some unhinged 1984 doublethink. “Our imperialism is the good kind. The other side is the bad imperialists.”

    • doomcanoe@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I dunno, they are literally holding a gun to the back of the “Proud Liberal’s” head.

    • Damionsipher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Using violent tactics is not synonymous with war mongering. Maybe a definition helps to differentiate the difference “A warmonger is someone strongly pro-war. Warmongers favor war above all other options.”

    • Rooskie91@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      What anarchists talk about cleansing? Are you referring to the dictatorship of the proletariat in Leninism?

      You can’t just make things up about an ideology and then argue like the thing you made up is true and well known. That makes you exactly like the meme you’re making fun of.

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        22 hours ago

        A lot of anarchists do seem to want a big purge. I’m not saying that’s inherently part of the ideology as a whole—I’m fairly sympathetic to anarchist ideals. But I’m not as sympathetic to terminally online weirdos who just want an outlet for their impotent rage. And a lot of such people do call themselves anarchists.

        • Rooskie91@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 hours ago

          I feel that difference exists for every ideology, though. Like a terminally online socialist or communist are also full of impotent, misguided rage.

          Speaking from experience, when a terminally online inset -ist ideology here shows up for their first in person meeting, they usually require some amount of reframing.

        • flandish@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          to indicate those under that flag have been saying “always have been” - it’s the meme.

        • PugJesus@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          The Red Terror during the Spanish Civil War comes to mind.

          No ideology is without its fanatics.

          • jwiggler@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            22 hours ago

            Thanks, I’ll read up on it.

            But from what I’ve read so far, the violence wasn’t exclusively from anarchist groups and more of mass violence from all leftist groups during that time towards clerics and rightists?

            • PugJesus@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              22 hours ago

              The violence wasn’t exclusively from anarchist groups, but in anarchist-dominated areas, the anarchists committed the same kinds of violence that other leftists did.

              This isn’t to say that the anarchists were not the best of the lot, by far. Only that the notion that anarchists don’t engage in unjustified mass violence against political enemies because of the sheer purity of their convictions doesn’t stand up to scrutiny.

              • jwiggler@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                22 hours ago

                I gotcha. I believe it. Have any book recs on the topic? Think this’ll probably be the my next lil history read after I’m done 100 Years War on Palestine

                edit: topic being spanish civil war period

                • PugJesus@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  22 hours ago

                  Most of this is recollected from college. I can definitely recommend Orwell’s Homage to Catalonia for a ground-eye view of the Spanish Civil War in general, though.

  • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Stupid Americans. Fight wars like the like Britain, France, Spain, The Netherlands, Sweden, Portugal, Germany, Belgium, Italy. Good honest colonial powers who only ever fought on the good side of just wars and never created massacres.

    • balderdash@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      Why choose other imperialist powers as though this is a representative sample? Unless you’re arguing that every country is equally bad–thereby excusing the US from its war crimes–its unclear what these examples are meant to prove.

    • balderdash@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      The military industrial complex is pretty well known at this point. I suspect they agree with the message, but don’t like that it’s coming from someone further left than Democrats.

      • Glide@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        You can go further left than the Democrats without pandering for another warmongering, imperialist nation.

        • balderdash@lemmy.zipOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          I don’t recall doing the latter. Either there’s an implication to the post that I’m not picking up on or you’re strawmanning me.

          • Glide@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            I sincerely hope this is some extremely high level “I can only perceive things in their most literal sense” genuine (non-durogatory) autism going on here. The other option is far less kind.

            • balderdash@lemmy.zipOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 day ago

              So instead of giving a straight answer, you would rather shift the burden to the person asking you what the fuck you’re talking about.

              I can only assume you’re equating the hammer and sickle with the USSR rather than with communism more generally. The anarchism symbol underneath should clue you in to the fact that the post is not an endorsement of any particular regime. Ironically, you’re the one perceiving things in their most literal sense.

              • Glide@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                21 hours ago

                My brother in Christ, it is their flag. You didn’t use random hammer and sickle iconography. It’s the flag of the USSR.

                I suspect you know exactly what you are doing.

                • scapegarced@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  21 hours ago

                  Do you expect someone to make a flag that perfectly describes their personal philosophy for a shitpost on lemmy. To me it states that they hold some “extreme” (whatever that means anymore) leftist values and nothing more.

  • bubblybubbles@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    There’s a lot of Lemmy users around here who should be wearing that badge.

    Won’t even admit the US proxy war with Russia is happening 😂

    • takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      You could maybe argue that when Biden was in office. Right now it is as much proxy war as Germany and USSR invading Poland in 1939.

      • bubblybubbles@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Orange turd being in office kinda just throws everything to whack, even long standing US plans. The current US/Ukraine proxy war plan was in motion LONG before Biden was in office

        • takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Please go read a book. I recommend Road to Unfreedom by Timothy Snyder it gives a better understanding what’s going on for the past two decades. And despite being published in 2018 it made it clear that the 2022 full invasion would happen sooner or later.

          • bubblybubbles@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            24 hours ago

            by Timothy Snyder

            Wow. Of course I would see that piece of shit nazi apologist being recommended on a .world post. But from a db0 user? Just wow.