

According to the article it was royalty free and published open standards, but they do not make any claim to this being an FOSS system.


According to the article it was royalty free and published open standards, but they do not make any claim to this being an FOSS system.


If I thought it was an intentional joke, it wouldn’t have been ironic.


People are getting much more dumber, though, so if you starts using it more people might will does it too.
The irony of the sentiment of this comment against the flickering light of the dumpster fire that is its grammar is not lost on me.
I don’t think that’s going to go the way you think it will. Exhibit A: Freeing the Genie


Could they not think of an original name? Calling it YouTube-dl is just unnecessarily lazy and confusing. This appears to be mostly a docker image of yt-dlp, which is itself a fork of youtube-dl.


These are also pretty good at shielding you from biting insects and fascist police state spy cameras.
Well, it seems that every time a search engine’s AI gives me a definitive and wordy “answer” to a question I search and provides a helpful citation of the page from which it got that answer, it is ALWAYS just a completely hallucinated answer that the cited page in no way supports. This isn’t just hyperbole, this has been my experience with every single search engine AI summary
And I find myself having to go back and fix the autocorrect that my phone keyboard “helpfully” makes with increasing frequency. It used to be that autocorrect would just fix a typo when I’d obviously typed gibberish because I missed a key. But now, it is regularly replacing entire words that I’ve typed completely correctly with some other word that makes absolutely no sense.
I’m all for some specific uses of AI. Things like speech to text or images to text? Sure that’s a great use. But when it comes to research, writing, or spreadsheets, AI tools just need to shut up and stay the fuck out of my way. I’m becoming convinced a little more everyday that anyone using AI to summarize articles or search results is a complete moron and shouldn’t be trusted.
Calling a Ruby Tuesday’s a restaurant is kind of like me calling myself a carpenter because I’ve assembled a few pieces of Ikea furniture. It’s basically sit down fast food with a liquor license.
Same energy as:


Could be


Clarissa Explains It All maybe?
If the sight of living human bodies in any state of dress or undress makes you uncomfortable, maybe that’s more your problem than theirs. Your line of etiquette logic is so easily manipulated to abuse and de-humanize people that I can’t help but see it as anything but a tool of (usually misogynistic) violence.


I’ve made these movies a collection on my Plex/Jellyfin server.

This is way too coherent.


It’s probably like getting a rescue breath from a blue whale.
What is good natured about this?
You’re a bully. I hope you find some non-toxic relationships someday.
As that dude would say, “Get Fucked!” A good prank has everyone laughing, including the person being pranked. This is just being shitty to someone and laughing at their plight in dealing with it. This is a shitty fucking “prank” and I wouldn’t count anyone that treated me this way, for any reason, as a friend. If someone has to chase down the victim and explain the joke/prank, then it wasn’t a prank.
That’s the part that confused me. Doesn’t seem particularly useful or wise to equip a helicopter with a nuke. Seems kind of suicidal actually.