Redjard

Seems centered on books not papers

And of

Very neat

That’s not a webview, it’s a separate api with fewer abilities. Custom tabs I believe.
You can see for example that it always opens as a fullscreen overlay in your app and that it always has that bottom or in your case top bar.

glass half full half empty has no good answer. This one does.
Heaters are 100% inefficient machines (tho 100% efficient at their job) and pure virus is 100% unsanitary (tho 100% pure)

Is a space heater 100% efficient or 100% inefficient?

Probably only sucessful ones.
Google captchas have had multiple rounds (with it faking you out claiming you failed) for probably a decade. Every round of the game updates some confidence score which if you get it high enough lets you pass.
This conversely means there is no way to fail, you just get stuck in an infinite loop of challenges if your score doesn’t get high enough.

The only other alternative means of pricing it would see even valid users consume way more than one “verification” per actual completed captcha, since so many users have low enough scores to need multiple rounds of captcha even when completing them with perfect accuracy.
I doubt they do this, but if they do it’s a scandal waiting to happen, besides also being very weird for any kind of statistic google certainly offers for their captcha.

Feel like it’s less about the masonry and more about how Brandwand sounds quite silly

tan suiite

satunit

Needs a none option for base

Fixed a mediawiki maintenance script via a 2 char change last week.

[email protected]

Isn’t beginner++ gonna leave it unchanged?
range(val) iterates from 0 to val-1, so the final i+1 is val

They did this exact thing for csam detection a while back, and were made to stop due to public outcry.
It might have been analyzed locally and before encryption then though, still however without consent of the user and sending problematic results to apple.

It is very realistic that here they would make the device decrypt and check the description against a database and make it send the file and description off for reporting when a match is found.

utilman.exe -> cmd.exe

stage3-amd64-systemd-20220904T170535Z.tar.xz

If that is true, how does the brain work?

Call everything you have ever experienced the finite dataset.
Constructing your brain from dna works in a timely manner.
Then training it does too, you get visibly smarter with time, so on a linear scale.

Shows as 1 comment for me

to avoid stuffing the beans

No idea what that means

“sockpuppet investigations” page instead so you can look into it further by yourself

I don’t see how that is related. I am by no means a wikipedia expert but reading that article and some of the linked investigations it all seems mundane to me.

᠎

tbh this response seems kinda shitty to me. You originally said “[Wikipedia] has a despicable procedure where they dox details of anyone whom they deem as alleged vandals.”. I interpret this as a systemic issue (procedure, they) which happens regularly or always (procedure, anyone). It makes me imagine a wiki page “Vandalism cases on wikipedia” containing a table of cases with date, article, edit, and IP/account, existing for months or years frequented by wikipedia mods and admins.

I interpret your response now as ‘there is info but it is private and part of ongoing investigations’.
If it was a larger issue there should be evidence. After all doxxing is precisely about making something publically available.
My interpretation now is that this is a small thing which either happened in the past or is unknown?

Can you please be specific about what you are referring to? And even without giving evidence, at least clarify what you aledge wikipedia or admins or anyone else did here?

[Wikipedia] has a despicable procedure where they dox details of anyone whom they deem as alleged vandals.

Any details on this?