Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said Sunday that “millions will be killed” in his country’s war with Russia without additional funding from the United States.

CNN’s Kaitlan Collins asked Zelensky in an interview to respond to comments made by Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio), who claimed Ukraine’s outcome in its war will not be changed even if it receives the President Biden’s $60 billion aid request. Zelensky said he wasn’t sure if Vance “understands what is going on here.”

“To understand it is to come to the front line to see what’s going on, to speak with the people, then to go to civilians to understand … what will [happen to] them without this support. And he will understand that millions … will be killed. It’s a fact,” Zelensky said.

  • TruthAintEasy@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    108
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    For 50 years its been Russia bad, Communists evil. And now the USA has a freed hand to fund a proxy war with Russia and they just cant agree on it? Smells like Kompromat

      • tacosplease@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        10 months ago

        And don’t forget Russia hacked the RNC the same time they hacked the DNC. They only released what they hacked from the DNC though.

        Seems very likely whatever was on the RNC servers was far worse than what was on the DNC servers, because gestures broadly at Republicans.

        So why haven’t we seen anything from the RNC hack? The answer that makes the most sense to me is that the RNC hacked info is being used to blackmail several Republicans into working for Russia.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      “I’m sorry, but I just don’t see how I can turn a profit on keeping you alive.” —JD Vance

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      That, or he cares, but in the wrong direction. Which is plausible, considering how much the GOP tends to align with shit Putin says these days.

    • Cipher22@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think part of what Europe a whole is missing is that the US as a general population is withdrawing, possibly even to pre-1940’s levels. If that happens, globalization as a whole is at risk.

      • Riccosuave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Says who? What “general population”? If you’re referring to the roughly 1/3 of this country that are either openly fascist, or fascist adjacent then it is on the rest of us to deliver crushing blows to their ideology. Nobody is coming to save us, and we must be willing to muster the courage of our convictions to defeat them. I don’t think they represent anything approaching a majority, but they are still incredibly dangerous.

        • Finalsolo963@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          10 months ago

          You see it on the left as anti-imperialism. Obviously not the same thing as the “America first” crowd, but the general sentiment that the US should not be as directly involved in the affairs of other countries has been on the rise for a long time and poll numbers bear that out

          • Riccosuave@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            I see your point, but the sentiment is still strong that America should be involved as a global leader, even in the data you provided. While that number has gone down, it still shows that roughly two thirds of the electorate do not want to embrace isolationism. However, I do think it matters what that participation in the world looks like, and like anything else there is a lot of nuance to that.

  • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    It has to suck so bad for Zelensky to be looking over here at the US and seeing one of the two parties is Putin’s lapdog.

  • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    millions will be killed

    Nothing excites a conservative more than the agony and death of millions of innocent people. Bloodlust of the vulnerable is a fundamental conservative trait.

  • jobby@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Oh… he doesn’t care. Or maybe he does, but he likes the thought.

    People like JD Vance get off on cruelty.

  • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    10 months ago

    JD Vance is a charlatan and a spokesperson for the alt-right. He didn’t write Hillbilly Elegy, and he’s actively promoting the presidency of someone who said they would turn the US into a dictatorship.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said Sunday that “millions will be killed” in his country’s war with Russia without additional funding from the United States.

    CNN’s Kaitlan Collins asked Zelensky in an interview to respond to comments made by Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio), who claimed Ukraine’s outcome in its war will not be changed even if it receives the President Biden’s $60 billion aid request.

    The latest U.S. estimate said Russia has had more than 300,000 casualties in the war since invading Ukraine, according to a senior U.S. defense official.

    Additional aid to Ukraine has been held up in Congress as House Republicans have tied stricter border provisions to approving more funding for the country.

    A bipartisan Senate deal on border security that included aid for Ukraine, Israel and Indo-Pacific allies was unveiled earlier this month, but the deal fell apart after House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.)

    President Biden is scheduled to host the four congressional leaders at the White House on Tuesday to discuss funding for Ukraine and efforts to avert a potential government shutdown as Congress is facing a pair of looming spending deadlines in the coming weeks.


    The original article contains 411 words, the summary contains 183 words. Saved 55%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • Mastengwe@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Isn’t it amazing how what Russia is doing in Ukraine isn’t genocide simply because of how Biden handles it?

    Who knew that the definition of “genocide” was entirely reliant on what one US president did.

    Seems no rats’s asses are given about what’s going on over there, nor any props given that Biden is helping them to defend themselves-

    • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      I seem to recall the internet absolutely called Ukraine a genocide when Russia started abducting and deporting Ukrainian children.

      • Mastengwe@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        And they’re still doing that. Guess it’s just not cool anymore to mention it now that Biden is an easier target for right wing pripaganda.

    • InternetUser2012@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Biden could come up with world peace, feed everyone for free and have health insurance for everyone along with the best economy we’ve ever seeen and the Republicans would still be talking shit about a made up laptop.

  • Thirdborne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s his job to milk the rest of us for all he can get but I’m still sick of him coming round with his hand out.

      • Thirdborne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        One coin, two sides. What agenda has you looking up and responding to my 2 month old comment? Makes me think all these cries of “Russian bot!” Are projection of some kind. But you know, I don’t think your shit resonates with any human.

  • doingthestuff@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    10 months ago

    Americans are choosing between food and housing. I’m choosing to pay to keep my house and I’m thankful I can hit up food pantries here and there. It’d be cool if billionaires paid for that shit but here we are.

  • Thief_of_Crows@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    100
    ·
    10 months ago

    Damn, that sucks. Not sure why it’s our problem though. Millions of Russians will be killed if we do give them aid. Ukraine should learn to solve their own problems.

      • Thief_of_Crows@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        10 months ago

        Genocide is awful. If Russia were doing that in Ukraine, I’d be all for a war over it. This is a war over a couple ports Russia wants. Completely irrelevant to america, and not our problem.

        • sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Russia is committing genocide in Ukraine, assuming we are using the rather expansive definition that people are now using for the Israel-Hamas conflict.

          The US should definitely support Ukraine, but Europe could do a hell of a lot more to ramp up war production. All the talk is about US aid, but the Europeans are being massive pussies. They brag about sending more food and medical aid, but Russia won’t be intimidated by that. Europe needs to convert to a war economy, massively ramp up war production, and supply Ukraine with unlimited military equipment. This is a war whose outcome will be determined by industrial production, which means Russia will certainly win if Europe doesn’t get its collective ass in gear. The US should take the opportunity to ramp up military production as well, but the Europeans are a lot closer to the action and have much more at stake. The Europeans should agree to take the lead on Ukraine while the US gears up for competition with China.

          • Thief_of_Crows@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            10 months ago

            No, they are not. Israel is though. These things have definitions for a reason. If Europe and Russia want to have a war, they can go right ahead. America needs to stay out of it though. Fuck their wars. I would happily dodge a draft, as would most people I know. America needs to learn to make money by building things, instead of by blowing them up. No war with Russia, no war with China, ever. If Congress wants a war, it better be drafting every single child of a congressman first. Otherwise Americans are not going to show up.

            • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Russia abducted and deported thousands of children. That alone meets the criteria agreed upon in the UN for genocide.

              The lowkey pro-Russian takes you have are as transparent as they are full of logical inconsistencies.

            • sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              I’m not sure where you are getting the idea that what Russia is doing in Ukraine is somehow less genocidal than what Israel is doing. At least Israel has the excuse that they were attacked by Hamas, and that Hamas’s ultimate goal is the extermination of Israel. Ukraine did nothing to Russia and has no thought of eliminating Russia as a country. Ukraine’s only “crime” was being friendly with the West, which also has no intention of eliminating Russia, except in Putin’s paranoid fantasies.

      • Thief_of_Crows@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        10 months ago

        LMAO, because I don’t want America to get in a war with Russia that is not remotely relevant to us? Y’all are brainwashed as fuck if you think Russia is the only evil country in the world.

    • TruthAintEasy@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Oh it is our problem, if Russia takes and keeps Ukrain that tells the whole world expansionism is back on the table. If you think war cant find its way to your doorstep, your wrong

      • Thief_of_Crows@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        10 months ago

        Damn, good thing America has all 10 of the worlds largest militaries then. Very much not concerned with that.

        • TruthAintEasy@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          War on your doorstep as an american doesnt look like enemy soldiers in the street. More like you wake up one day with no power, no tap water, no phone service, no internet, no way to get news or ask for help. Eventually a cop car rolls down the street loudspeaker blaring shelter in place orders, national guard will bring food and water later yadda yadda and all because we are extremely complacent towards security of utilities in the cyber space

          Sounds fun right?

          • Thief_of_Crows@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            10 months ago

            That just sounds like typical late stage capitalism, lol. But I have nothing against defense spending. America has very little defense spending though. The thing we call “defense” is very obviously 90% offense. America should spend our money helping our own people, not screwing around in wars half way around the world.

        • Omnificer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Because the millions for Ukraine accounts for civilian casualties, not purely military. For anything similar Ukraine would have to counter invade Russia and launch artillery at residential areas.

          Even if we assume the worst of Ukraine’s intent, they wouldn’t have the capability to go beyond securing their borders.

            • Omnificer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              You’re moving goalposts here. You said millions of Russians would die if Ukraine was given aid and I asked how you determined that number. By the same token, Russia should simply surrender.

    • Szymon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Why would millions of Russians be killed if Russia left Ukraine and went back home? Its Putin, not Ukraine. Slava Ukrainia!

        • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          There is an easy way for Russia to prevent those deaths (even though your numbers are hyperbolic): Pulling out of Ukraine, to the 2014 borders. Easy peasy, no more dead russians.

    • SuperIce@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Maybe Russia shouldn’t invade other countries if they don’t want their people to die

      • aidan@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Ironically exactly the opposite was upvoted in regards to hamas. That just because a government did something bad, the people don’t need to be punished- which I agree with.

      • Thief_of_Crows@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        10 months ago

        Still not seeing why America is supposed to give a crap about a war on the other side of the globe. We are still responsible for the deaths of millions if we give Ukraine all the weapons they desire.

        • tiltinyall@lemmy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          A destabilized EU, and that’s a guarantee there, would economically impact the entire world in ways that U.S.A exceptionalists can not ever seem to grasp.

        • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Lol, just be quiet troll. It’s easy looking at your post history that you have an agenda that is aligned with the opposition of America.

          A degraded russian military is good for pretty much everyone.

          And by the way you talk you probably don’t give a shit about socialised healthcare. It’s just a stick you can use to hit people with.

            • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              Not an American.

              You have some pretty dumb ideas about foreign policy.

              The fact that you used healthcare as an example is a conservative dogwhistle, and a rather ineffective one at that.

              Isolationism is something your country cannot go back to. That idea was rightly killed over a century ago, as if it was ever actually fully realised.

              I thought your country at least paid lip service to freedom and democracy worldwide, how is letting Russia invade and annex another country good for you?

              It’s not hard to tell that you aren’t someone who actually understands the topic, or is acting in good faith here.

                • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Well, Ukraine formally asked for aid at the beginning of Russia’s “special military operation”. Soooooo…

                  The US hasn’t sold a single thing to Ukraine, but has been donating their old stock.

                  How is helping Ukraine not a good thing? Doesn’t that increase security by having another friendly nation on your side?

                  Your arguments are rather weak. Seriously, how does allowing Russia have its way benefit anyone but Russia?

        • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          Because they aren’t going to stop. See when they took Crimea in 2014, now it’s a full invasion.

          You don’t try to appease fascists.

        • Mirshe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Because it’s not a “small” portion they WANT. That’s what’s known as a “beachhead”. Putin and the rest of the Duma have signaled that they want UKRAINE, in its totality, and preferably would not like those people with their ideas of “independence from Russia” in their heads - hence Putin actually saying the only victory he would accept is the destruction of Ukrainian identity as a concept (war against a concept doesn’t end well - see “war on terror/war on drugs”.) This is also ignoring the fact that Russia ALREADY tried the “storm in, kill the head of state, annex the country” bit with Georgia back in 2008, and got their shit kicked in by the Georgian military. Expansionist powers like Russia don’t just stop with whatever country they’re currently invading - there’s always another “over there” to go conquer.

          If you want more evidence on this, I highly recommend you read up on a little thing called Imperial Japan, or potentially just Manifest Destiny. There’s never such a thing as “enough” for a state hellbent on expanding at all costs into territory they think is rightfully “theirs”.

    • Kalkaline @leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Ukraine is the world’s “bread basket” they produce a ton of the world supply of wheat and barley.

        • InternetUser2012@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Hey, I want your car. You should give me your car so I don’t have to forcefully take it from you. Ok? Great, let me know where to pick up it. Don’t like that idea? Why not?

          • Thief_of_Crows@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            You said we need the grain there. We will still be able to get the grain that’s there. How’s that appeasement?

            • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              How is it not? Allowing Russia to invade and take over another country is some 18th century shit, and tells them they can do this with impunity.

              So, you push isolationist, defeatist and appeasement propaganda and you wonder why people call you a bot and a troll.

                • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  America isn’t being the World Police, not in this instance. We’re enabling the Ukrainians to defend themselves, but otherwise are not active participants.

                  Neither is the UN, BTW. This is a war Ukraine has to fight and win on their own.

    • Voran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      They are solving their own problems by fighting back. Unfortunately that requires missiles that fucking cost money.