The House has voted 211 to 204 to refer the articles of impeachment filed against Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to committee, effectively killing the impeachment effort spearheaded by Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky.

Tuesday’s vote short-circuits any potential floor vote on the articles of impeachment, and virtually guarantees the measure will not be taken up before the current session of Congress expires.

The vote provided a surprise reprieve for President Trump’s embattled Defense Secretary, who was facing an impeachment vote by the full House as early as Wednesday.

Massie reintroduced the articles of impeachment on Monday, accusing Hegseth of high crimes and misdemeanors in connection to the war with Iran and U.S. strikes against Iran and on alleged drug boats in the Caribbean Sea and Eastern Pacific Ocean.

    • FishFace@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Nope, this is one of the principles of truth and reconciliation. It’s predicated on the idea that all parties want to move on from the wrongdoing, rather than one or more wishing to continue it.

      • flandish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        not punishing those doing war crimes is not moving on. it’s allowing it to continue.

        • FishFace@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          I see you’re doing your best not to understand and congratulate yourself on your success.

          • flandish@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            18 hours ago

            what do we gain by their promising during an election cycle that which they never intend to do? how does not punishing literal criminals help?

            • FishFace@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              18 hours ago

              The prerequisites for truth and reconciliation are not met in the US at the moment, as I made clear, so that’s not what I am talking about.

              • flandish@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                17 hours ago

                why would you think all parties want to move forward from the wrongdoing? and how do you think they want to implement that movement, and why are you ok with them not going after criminals?

                • FishFace@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  17 hours ago

                  why would you think all parties want to move forward from the wrongdoing?

                  I didn’t make this claim about any specific situation. Do you want to know about a situation where this has been the case, or did you misunderstand me?

                  • flandish@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    13 hours ago

                    my failure to understand is thanks to your lack of articulation. why are you seemingly ok with no prosecution thus far?