• LostCarcosan@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    Take your unhelpful intentional misinterpretations and propaganda somewhere else there, little buddy.

    • marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      3 days ago

      Answer the question. The DNC has and will again simply stop people from running in the democratic primaries. There is no law to stop them from just refusing entry to the party or revoking the party affiliation.

      So primaries do not work for this. As history shows. So how, exactly, are you going to threaten someone if the party says they’re the only blue candidate?

      What if the DNC just stops having primaries? There’s no law that says they have to have primaries, or have to have public primaries. It’s all convention.

    • Grimy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      It’s a fair point. We don’t have much leverage in a two party system. Letters to reps aren’t going to cut it, protesting against the “good” guys just as hard as we did against the fascists is basically the only option at this point.

      • Alkali@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        3 days ago

        Primaries. Vote for who the party doesn’t want. It’s actually really simple.

      • Sonicdemon86@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        Voting in primaries is for voting with your feelings. Voting in the generals is for voting with your head. Basically vote in primaries if you don’t like how the dems did and vote blue no matter who in the generals.

        • Grimy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          I’m saying that we need to properly pressure them instead of expecting them to save us willingly. Waiting for the next round of primaries isn’t enough, they simply won’t make the needed choices if they don’t have to.

          • LostCarcosan@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            Well that’s entirely the point then, isn’t it? Tell them that if they don’t do their job properly, then they’ll be fired. I don’t get why that’s such a crazy hard to understand concept, but whatever makes it so hard to understand is probably what got people like Trump into office in the first place

      • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        We’re doing the work right now. Climb onboard or get out of the way. We have a long way to go without dragging any deadweight behind us

      • LostCarcosan@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        No, it’s not a fair point. You seem to either not fully understand what voting is or how elections work. The ‘leverage’ is that if they don’t do what we want them to do, they lose their jobs. I wish there were more severe consequences to abandoning the voters, but we don’t have those yet and the only way to get there is to vote