• hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    I seriously doubt it as well. Chances AI destroys humanity within the next 3 years and 3 months should be close to zero. The conclusion, though! Why would we do that if it destroys us for example by 2034?!??

    • PonyOfWar@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      24 days ago

      OpenAI/Anthropic want regulation to make sure they dominate the market and prevent any competition. Nvidia wants no regulation so they can sell as many GPUs as possible and keep driving the prices up. That’s pretty much all there is to this supposed debate about the dangers of AI.

      • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        Thanks for pointing it out! And seems they’re doing a phenomenal job. I currently get like 3 articles each day with someone beating the drums and spreading this exact narrative.

        • dmir@gehirneimer.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          24 days ago

          I personally believe there’s also publicity reasons here: fearmongering has been working so well for so many, so something as ghoulish as AI companies are sure to use it as well.

          • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            24 days ago

            Sure. I guess next to what PonyOfWar said, it’s also going to attract investor money if people think their product is super powerful, like being able to extinguish an entire civilization. I mean we do know they phrase something like the report on how that “agent swarm” hacked Huggingface to sound like a thriller movie script. I bet that’s done deliberately and all about publicity.