“Why would you even get into bestiality?” he asked. “We’re not into bestiality,” said Patel.

In a further exchange, Patel explained to Senator John Kennedy, the Louisiana Republican, that previously, regulations had barred anyone who engaged in bestiality “on either side of it.”

“Either side of what, the bestiality?” asked Kennedy. “So you disqualified the animal?”

“We have great canines, but we’re not going to disqualify them,” said Patel.

  • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    19 days ago

    Under the law, we do not criminalize or hold people to actions taken under duress. You can keep the policy and just qualify the action to having been done willfully. You don’t need to allow abusers in to open the door for victims.

    • Gaslov@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      Ok? Do you not understand the policy change? You are under the impression that willful beastiality is now allowed in the FBI? If you believe that, why do you believe that? Are you ok with having unreliable information?

      • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        He just said that the policy disallowed the fucking dogs who had been victimized. Are you expecting sensibility on these policies? Are you for real?

        Yes I believe 1000% that whatever stupid excuse he gave for this policy change, it will be used primarily to put more unqualified, criminal, deviants into positions of federal authority. That seems to be this administrations bread and butter. Do you think that the Patel FBI who protects Trump and all the other Epstein abusers has high moral standards quality of its hirees? Come on.