• anguo@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      … They’re symmetrical, they look the same from both directions.

      • Zachariah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        But 4 and 6 are read edge-in, and the others are read middle-out. The mirroring is inconsistent.

          • Zachariah@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            No, they look the same whether you’re viewing them standing inside or out on the street.

            To read the numbers so that they are correctly oriented, you’d read from the middle of a given pair outward for 1, 2, 3, and 5. But to read 4 and 6, you’d read from the edge inwards.

            Or (viewing from outside or inside) the second number in the pair is not reversed for 1, 2, 3, and 5. The first number is not reversed for 4 and 6.

            • anguo@piefed.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              I’m perfectly aware of all of this, this has nothing to do with my comment.

              • Zachariah@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 days ago

                Damn, you’re right. I misread what you wrote. I thought you were asking if it would be different from the inside. But that’s clearly not what you wrote.

    • Glowstick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Oh, very interesting point. Either way some of them are backwards which is a shame for a cool design idea like this