• dohpaz42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s only weird when you correlate “great” with only being a good thing. In and of itself , “great” is neither good nor bad. It simply describes a thing as more than average or normal.

    e.g. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were both great tragedies. They were also very bad things.

    e.g. Having a calm and rational discussion on the Internet is a great idea. It is also positive and reaffirming.

    • qarbone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah, “great” is about “magnitude”, not “quality”. They aren’t called the “Great Lakes” because they’re super awesome, but because they are fuck-off massive. It’s like the adjective “grand”.