AI actually is one of my primary supplementary tools for Bible study, with lumo being up there with Strong’s in its general usefulness overall. Basically couldn’t live without it. Also, makes for good third party retranslations from early publically available source texts.
FYI, whether fair or unfair, since you don’t mention having an error-catching mechanism, the rest of us suspect that Lumo is hallucinating things regularly, and you’re not catching the lies, because you lack familiarity with the original source material.
I desperately hope that AI makes drastically fewer mistakes in some roles than others, because most people do not report the error rates that I see in my areas of expertise. So either the errors aren’t happening evenly everywhere (probably true) or some people are simply not catching the many mistakes (also probably true, though?).
AI actually is one of my primary supplementary tools for Bible study, with lumo being up there with Strong’s in its general usefulness overall. Basically couldn’t live without it. Also, makes for good third party retranslations from early publically available source texts.
FYI, whether fair or unfair, since you don’t mention having an error-catching mechanism, the rest of us suspect that Lumo is hallucinating things regularly, and you’re not catching the lies, because you lack familiarity with the original source material.
I desperately hope that AI makes drastically fewer mistakes in some roles than others, because most people do not report the error rates that I see in my areas of expertise. So either the errors aren’t happening evenly everywhere (probably true) or some people are simply not catching the many mistakes (also probably true, though?).
🤨