• Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    132
    ·
    4 days ago

    Trying to combat drug addiction through policing has been proven ineffective time and time again. You may want to rethink that one.

    • f314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      4 days ago

      Came to say this! Drug addicts need help, not jail. Sure, if they commit a crime police should be involved, but it’s not going to cure their addiction!

      • MintyFresh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Idk. I’m a public bus driver, am in pretty consistent contact with drug users. Not to mention living in amongst them in the poorer areas of tow. I’m not saying we should arrest them and give them lengthy sentences, but just leaving them on the street ain’t working out.

        I think a mandatory “time out” in a facility is in order. At least long enough to work the drugs out of their system. Maybe then they can try for a better way with a little clearer head.

        But some days it feels like I’m living in a post apocalypse mad Max type place. It’s bullshit that they’re allowed to just trash anyplace they are. There’s what’s best for them, and there’s what’s best for the rest of us. There’s gotta be something done.

        • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Their “mandatory time out” doesn’t have to be punitive, or handled by the penal system at all.

          Step one: outreach and detox
          A social worker could show up and interview them, ask them if they want help. If they do, great. Get them in a car, take them to a detox center. If someone doesn’t want to go with the social worker (which might be a majority of patients), then the social worker gets their name and contact info if they can, gives them some brochures about the program and about the benefits of recovery, and moves on to interview others.

          about non-compliant/unwilling patients:

          That’s just the first pass. Another social worker comes by on another day and sees if anyone changed their mind, and if so, great, they take them to the detox center.

          Eventually though, something will need to be done about those who are unwilling to go; for their own benefit as much as anyone else’s. This should not be done by police though. There needs to be a special task force of social workers who are trained in self-defense, weapons handling, de-escalation, non-compliance, and least-necessary-force techniques.

          Basically, they show up sometime after the second or third pass and sweep up anyone who wasn’t willing to go. They take them to a special detox facility, still a comfortable and professional clinic, but with higher security in place, so that these patients won’t present problems for the ones who went willingly.

          If they detox successfully and their behavior improves significantly, they can be given an option to move to the next step with the others. If they remain belligerent or hostile, however, they need to be taken to a special higher-security version of it where they won’t be a barrier to others’ recovery. (Again, a clean and professional facility, but the staff have more specialized training for dealing with non-compliant patients).

          Step two: residential recovery
          After they detox, transfer them to a residential recovery program with a structured regiment, complete with in-house psychosocial therapy, prescription management, and recreational therapy.

          Step three: vocational therapy
          When they graduate from this program, get them into vocational therapy or a job training program, with the option to either live on their own (if their recovery has progressed well enough), or have them move into a smaller share house with a peer recovery coach.

          That’s a three-step approach:

          (outreach)→detox→recovery→reintegration.

          By the end of it they’ll be an active contributing member of society, have community support, hobbies, be enrolled in therapy, have their prescriptions managed, and have someone to check in on them periodically to help them maintain the good habits they’ve developed.

          Step four: return to full independence
          After maybe a year in the transitional housing then they get support searching for their own place and return to full independence with a year of sobriety under their belt, but they keep access to the same therapists, recreational groups, prescription management, and can keep in touch with their peer recovery coach.

          It sounds expensive, and it does require a lot of real estate, personnel, trained professionals, food and healthcare, etc. But with how much we already spend on police and prisons, it might actually save the taxpayers money in the end. Especially with universal healthcare; this would be harder to implement in the US where prescriptions can cost over $1000 per month for no reason, but universalizing healthcare first will make it more feasible.

          • Karmanopoly@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            60
            ·
            4 days ago

            I mean if you want to get specific what I really want is to remind police that doing drugs is illegal and they should focus on busting those people…instead of kids having fun on scooters

              • village604@adultswim.fan
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                34
                ·
                4 days ago

                In the US it’s so they can give black people felonies for being black so they can’t vote.

                That’s literally what started the war on drugs. Well, blacks and hippies.

                • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  This is also why alcohol, which is a way more harmful drug to others than all of the illegal drugs[1], is legal.

                  [1] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21036393/

                  Findings: MCDA modelling showed that heroin, crack cocaine, and metamfetamine were the most harmful drugs to individuals (part scores 34, 37, and 32, respectively), whereas alcohol, heroin, and crack cocaine were the most harmful to others (46, 21, and 17, respectively). Overall, alcohol was the most harmful drug (overall harm score 72), with heroin (55) and crack cocaine (54) in second and third places.

            • Takapapatapaka@tarte.nuage-libre.fr
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              21
              ·
              4 days ago

              riding scooter at 12 seems to be illegal too in vancouver, and people have fun on drugs too, so seems to me both things are pretty much interchangeable in your argument

            • mastertigurius@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              Busting drug addicts will do ZERO to help the drug and crime problems. Even law enforcers will tell you that.

              Those problems are so much more complex, and require fundamental reforms in social policies, mental healthcare, education, youth programmes, city planning etc. And then there’s the issue of dealing with the gangs, smugglers and foreign organized syndicates bringing the stuff into the country.

              Kids driving recklessly on scooters (which are often modified) are:

              A) A danger to themselves

              B) A danger to pedestrians they could crash into

              C) A serious danger to cars that swerve to avoid them when they go out on the main road.

          • Karmanopoly@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            25
            ·
            4 days ago

            The temporary decriminalization of doing drugs in British Columbia expired in January 2026

            So doing illicit drugs like crack or fentanyl on the streets is currently illegal again.

        • Lumelore (She/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Putting someone in timeout maybe works for three year olds but it doesn’t work for adults even if you hold them there 1000 times longer. Restitution and rehabilitation is a significantly more effective solution and results in much lower recidivism. Only reason to lock someone in a box is if they present a significant danger to the public, and that’s not to punish them, but to protect others.

  • Fishnoodle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    You get people off drugs by building a society where people aren’t being oppressed and used as slaves. Not by putting them in jail and making their life worse.

    Kids on the other hand aren’t fully mature and don’t realize that ‘just’ 30mph on a scooter can lead to a deadly crash pretty easily

    • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Teach the kids to use a scooter properly, all across asia children ride electrics without incident, but I am constantly hearing how dangerous they are back in America where barely anyone rides scooters.

      • Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yeah, when I think Singapore, I think utopia with no inequality or social pressures. The only thing bad is those pesky druggies that do simply because they’re bad people and want to do the bad drugs.

    • hpx9140@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      Thats what makes this an A tier shitpost.

      I’m willing to concede I have it wrong but I wouldn’t take it seriously. Just Karmanopoly goofing around with quality bait.

  • Noxy@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    4 days ago

    All research and successful drug policy shows that treatment should be increased And law enforcement decreased while abolishing mandatory minimum sentences

  • lukstru@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 days ago

    Dont fight drug use, fight drug distribution and the root problems why people are on the street taking drugs

      • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 days ago

        Drug use is a social problem. If I offered you a huge bag of fentanyl for free right now, would you take it? What conditions in your life would make you more likely to accept it? Lets address the things which cause those conditions for other people.

        • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Well, it depends. Do I have to pay for the fentanyl? Because if not, Imma take that bag of drugs to the hospital so they can dispose of it in a safe manner.

        • Karmanopoly@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          4 days ago

          If you have a bag of fentanyl to give out then putting you in jail solves the problem in my view

  • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 days ago

    Remember that time we legalized cannabis and it had literally zero impact on society? Let’s do that with the rest of them too.

  • einlander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 days ago

    Well if they would fix traffic infrastructure to support bicycles and other alternative transports they would have less of a problem with this.

    • Steve@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      Scooters aren’t inherently more dangerous. But people don’t take their safety seriously. They don’t wear helmets and protection. Resulting in more injuries and TBIs.

  • The Velour Fog @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Counterpoint: parents should be given tickets for endangering their child’s lives by giving them something that can cause death or greivous injury - calling it a “toy” that goes 30+ mph ridden on public roads with no training, license, or obeying traffic signs and signals.

    One of these days it’s going to be a lawmakers kid that is going to get turned into a meat crayon. Then we might just get some reasonable legislation. I hate that it pretty much has to come down to many children dying for meaningful change to take place.

    • Karmanopoly@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      4 days ago

      USA reports 11 deaths under 16 and Canada 10

      So 21 deaths in what 15 or 20 years these have been around

      Probably around 1 per year

      How many kids have been killed by drug users or drug dealers… probably more than 1 per Year

      USA alone has so many drug related shootings they probably can’t even reliably track how many kids get shot