I went to sign up for Club+ cause they said my card would stop working soon. Just as a side, I copy and pasted the terms of service and privacy policy into chat jippity and asked it if anything was strange. Looks like we’re allowing them to build up and share/sell a pretty rich profile including license plate data and facial recognition.

Might be worth it to have a read beforevblindly clicking through.

Also, if you play minecraft this site can be useful: https://pooworld.co.nz/

  • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    I decided a long time ago that the hassle and privacy issues of those loyalty schemes do not make being a member worthwhile.

    • Dave@lemmy.nzM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah there was that thing a few years back by maybe Consumer NZ or someone like that, that showed the average savings were around 0.75%. And you can still get those savings with cuntdown.co.nz for countdown/woolworths and the one linked above pooworld.co.nz.

      So I’ve stopped as well. Fewer cards in my wallet and no need to have their apps installed.

      • Ilovethebomb@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m tempted to sign up for one of these under a pseudonym. Do you think anyone would notice that Heywood Jablome had joined their scheme.

        • Dave@lemmy.nzM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          They probably wouldn’t care! The spending patterns will be valuable regardless of the name. That’s what’s so cool about the websites, it just generates random valid memberships that I assume assign the purchases to random people (or cards that haven’t been activated yet).

            • Dave@lemmy.nzM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Interesting! I once wrote an excel macro that used checksums to validate bank accounts, and I cannot remember anything about them except that it was just maths. So I’m guessing the websites just use this format as described in your link.

              In your link they are speculating about invalid numbers. If they still have stacks of them in the shops to hand out to people who would want to use them right away, I doubt they would reject an unregistered card. Just record it the same way as any card but only allow points or whatever to be spent when it’s been registered.

              I’ve used the cuntdown site a lot and can only remember one time the barcode was rejected.

              • nsh@lemmy.nz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                I haven’t used it heaps but it has never failed for me so far.

                I think you’re right about the pre-populated codes. I don’t think they do user verification at runtime. That would hurt the self-checkout experience even more - their app is already painfully slow. But as the author said, stupid decisions have been made.