• 1 Post
  • 233 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle




  • No: Complicated location-based schemes would be awful. I used to live in an area with a number of time-based driving restrictions. The occasional “you got a fine because you drove down that road on the wrong day” sucked, and I lived in the area and knew the roads. I can’t imagine it was fun for visitors.

    Yes: fairer charging. Move ACC levies to the usage not the rego. You can’t drive your work car and your personal car at the same time. Barely drive? You’re less likely to be in or cause an accident. Maybe even chuck in charges for general “harm” (ie polluters, massive American ‘trucks’, etc)

    No: GPS tracking can fuck right off. Who’s paying for ~6 million trackers? Who’s managing all that data? Who’s overseeing all that data? What’s stopping the govt suddenly deciding “we’ll fine you immediately when you speed. Anywhere, any time”? I’d rather have the shitty prepaid paper system over GPS.

    Yes: it is a good opportunity for innovation. But it’s also a good opportunity to funnel millions of not billions of money and data into the hands of a private overseas company to build, test, deploy and manage… Can we not?








  • As a recent EV and diesel owner, the current RUC system is dog shit.

    But I’m not sure how they’re going to make it any better.

    Allowing it to be post-paid when you do your WoF would just lead to a massive bill every year unless you stayed on top of it.

    But what bills are the ones you don’t pay when you’re hard up? The optional ones. So that would stil impact the poorest despite “being fair”.

    Unless they allow you to pay outstanding RUCs over the year, but I doubt that.

    And neither of these options sound likely. The calls to “enable innovation” just sounds like a way to tack corporate fees onto a national tax.